Comments on: Rosenzweig on Wikipedia… http://chnm.gmu.edu/courses/f06/cliowired/2006/09/13/rosenzweig-on-wikipedia/ Just another WordPress weblog Fri, 24 Nov 2006 18:43:51 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1 hourly 1 By: Dieter Stenger http://chnm.gmu.edu/courses/f06/cliowired/2006/09/13/rosenzweig-on-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-6 Dieter Stenger Sun, 17 Sep 2006 13:45:55 +0000 http://chnm.gmu.edu/courses/f06/cliowired/2006/09/13/rosenzweig-on-wikipedia/#comment-6 I sensed a great deal of negativity from the class as it related to the use of Wikipedia. Roy Rosenzweig is definately an advocate of the media, having challenged us all to go in and correct any entries that might be wrong. Does mankind deserve such a profound service from individuals who have poured their hearts and minds into a given topic? I think most non-History 696: Clio Wired folks, such as Rosenzweig and Greenberg, would welcome your labor of love with open arms. I am pro-wikipedia too, but when the rubber hits the road, if someone were to ask me to submit my history project that I have been working on for the last five years, I would have to decline the invitation! I sensed a great deal of negativity from the class as it related to the use of Wikipedia. Roy Rosenzweig is definately an advocate of the media, having challenged us all to go in and correct any entries that might be wrong. Does mankind deserve such a profound service from individuals who have poured their hearts and minds into a given topic? I think most non-History 696: Clio Wired folks, such as Rosenzweig and Greenberg, would welcome your labor of love with open arms. I am pro-wikipedia too, but when the rubber hits the road, if someone were to ask me to submit my history project that I have been working on for the last five years, I would have to decline the invitation!

]]>