ARTH 201: COMPARISON EXERCISE (c) Sheila ffolliott
To help prepare for tests, here is the opportunity to try a comparison. You need to find a person to practice with in order to do the complete exercise. Print out the sheet and then refer back to the images.
![]() |
![]() |
Compare these two objects in essay form. Here's how to do it. First pinpoint an immediate apparent reason for this particular comparison: it doesn't have to be profound--it may be quite obvious. Use that initial observation as the basis for your opening sentence and write it here.
1. opening sentence:
2. Now think about significant similarities and differences in the two slides. You must demonstrate that you are really looking at the images, so relate what you say to what you can actually see. Don't write about one slide first in its entirety and then discuss the other. Integrate your answers by proceeding issue by issue (e.g., the use of color in both). Use sentences. Example: Light is more important to the slide on the left than to the slide on the right because ... (and give your reason here). First describe something you notice and then analyze what you think the artist has done to achieve the effect. Example: Outlines are are more clearly visible on the left. Or analyze what difference the effect makes (by asking yourselves SO WHAT?) Example: "The emphasis on detail on the left helps create a sense of balance in the composition." Your analysis should focus first on the formal issues you observe, but then you should seek to relate your observations to what you know about the historical context (e.g. purpose). Remember that this is a timed question. Write these observations here:
3. When you only have a few minutes remaining, you must stop and draw a conclusion as to the significance of the comparison. Answer this question in a nice cogent sentence: what is the MOST IMPORTANT thing that this comparison illustrates about the history of art ? Don't make it a cop-out: say something meaningful and punchy.
PEER REVIEW COMMENTS. Read your fellow student's essay carefully and comment especially on the following points. Remember that you're trying to help each other improve, so you're not doing anyone a favor by complimenting her when some constructive criticism would really help. Write comments here and on the essays themselves.
1. Is there a clear introductory sentence that sets out the basis for the comparison? If not, what's the matter?
2. Are the observations that follow clearly stated? Where yes, where no?
3. Is there evidence that the writer has looked carefully at the slides? Do the comments consider formal issues? If that's missing, point out where. Does the writer understand the difference between form and subject matter?
4. Does the writer analyze as well as describe? Does s/he attempt to explain how and/or why the artist achieved the effects described?
5. Is there sufficient attention to the historical context (how what you see relates to the time period)?
6. Is there a conclusion that synthesizes the essence of what the comparison points out? If not, how could it be improved?
Any other advice?