
Historian Roy Rosenzweig concludes that in the 1910s
and particularly the 1920s, advertising agents focused their attention
on identifying—and often inventing—personal anxieties
that could be resolved by the purchase of specific products. “Advertising,”
wrote one commentator in a trade publication, “helps to keep
the masses dissatisfied with their mode of life, discontented with
ugly things around them. Satisfied customers are not as profitable
as discontented ones.” Advertisers, as historian Stuart Ewen
notes, tried to endow people with a “critical self-consciousness”
directed especially at their personal appearances.
That was the strategy followed, for example, by Odo-Ro-No,
a deodorant for women, which in 1919 became the first company to
use the term “B.O.” (meaning, but not saying, “body
odor”) in an advertisement. Previously, deodorant ads had
confined their pitch to suggestions about how they would foster
daintiness and sweetness. But Odo-Ro-No took a much more direct
approach, telling potential customers to take the “Armhole
Odor Test” and warning them that social success hinged on
eliminating B.O.
Listerine mouthwash took a similar approach. The Lambert
Pharmaceutical Company had developed the antibacterial liquid back
in the 1880s, and it was long sold as a general antiseptic. After
World War I, the company sought to expand its market. Advertising
man Gordon Seagrove recalls being called in by the Lambert Brothers
to discuss how this could be done. The company’s chief chemist
was enlisted to describe the product and its uses. “As he
read along in a singsong voice,” Seagrove remembers, “he
mentioned halitosis. Everybody said ‘What’s that?’”
Learning that it referred to “unpleasant breath,” they
immediately thought “maybe that’s the peg we can hang
our hat on.”
Although there was some worry about whether such a “delicate
subject” could be handled in magazines and newspapers, Seagrove
and his collaborator, Milton Feasley, launched an ad campaign that
played heavily on fears about how others would react to a halitosis
sufferer. The most famous of their ads concerned the “pathetic”
case of “Edna,” who was “often a bridesmaid but
never a bride.” She was approaching the “tragic”
thirtieth birthday unmarried because she suffered from halitosis—a
disorder that “you, yourself, rarely know when you have it.
And even your closest friends won’t tell you.” Tragic
Edna can be seen on the right
In response to the ad campaign, Listerine sales went from $100,000
per year in 1921 to more than $4 million in 1927. Meanwhile, the
strategy of ads as “quick-tempo socio-dramas in which readers
were invited to identify with temporary victims in tragedies of
social shame,” writes historian Roland Marchand, led to a
new “school of advertising practice.”
Next |
|
The example on the left is from 1898.
It claims a wide variety of cures thanks to its unexplained "extract."
The ad is calculated to catch the eye, with its headline, but spends
most of its space listing the product's virtues and warning against
counterfeits.
Besides capitalizing on worries about
health, ad agencies early on recognized that people were anxious
about social status--about appearing prosperous or comfortable,
wealthy and "up to date. The ad below, also for "Pond's
Extract," comes from 1915. By then, it had become easier (and
cheaper) to include illustrations in mass advertisements.


|