From The Mason Historiographiki
Lisa McGirr. Suburban Warriors: The Origins of the New American Right. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (2001) ISBN: 0-691-05903-9
Lisa McGirr traces the beginnings of the American right after 1960 through Orange County, California. She attempts to fix the old historographies that claimed right-wingers were generally the downtrodden or ignorant. Historians had generally contended the right-wing movement was a rejection of modernity. Dr. McGirr claims otherwise and states the movement was an old tradition that adapted to modern issues. Orange County was a prototype for the American right. A combination of defense spending affluence, and immigration from the conservative Midwest made Orange County a very conservative county. She contends anti-communism was the glue of the movement. It glued together social conservatives worried about moral failure and libertarians committed to individual rights and limited government. Religion was very important in the rise of the right wing. This movement arose much earlier than just as a response to race riots. It grew from an anti-communist agenda to one fighting the welfare state, and the loosening of morals in the country. She claims the right was made of educated, professional, middle-class Americans who adapted to modern society. They paid more attention to the nation and politics than did others. Dr. McGirr points out just how widespread and how energetic this movement was. They capitalized on the growing conservatism of a nation rocked by the social problems of the second half of the twentieth century. The family, individual rights, and their way of life were threatened by the liberal state. Dr. McGirr sees this movement as culminating in the Reagan revolution. Religious conservatives joined and fought gay rights, abortion, crime and other social issues. Anti-communism was replaced by these issues as the linchpin of the movement. They were looking for a protection of property rights, religion and the family.
Chuck Crum Fall 2009
This work is a welcome breath of fresh air to studies of the right in that it does capture the essence of who were the people that made up the right. Dr. McGirr does not assume the New Deal is right, everyone wanted it, except those that were wrong. This is a nice grassroots history of conservative voters. She is perplexed by their political views, however, and it shows. She claims they won adherents by emphasizing the individual, giving the go-ahead to their greed, without comprehending that was what causing the social breakdown. She is wrong. She does miss the fact that social conservatism and libertarian views can be compatible. She may also suggest too much. It is very possible that people did not change nearly as much as a switch in vote may seem. Their own views hadn't changed, they simply voted differently, for a variety of reasons. People often vote against their beliefs or best interests, particularly in a national election where something as simple as the personality of a candidate or the media's influence decides the vote. The core beliefs of the voter may not have moved at all. This may have been the situation with many Americans prior to 1961 and it stayed that way. Goldwater's nomination and subsequent defeat does not necessarily mean people abandoned what McGirr class extremism and thus became more mainstream. There were other factors involved in Johnson's victory. It can also be problematic to extrapolate from one county to an entire political party or movement. Dr. McGirr also looked at activists, not the majority of the voting public.
John Lillard, Spring 2010
In Suburban Warriors, Lisa McGirr uses the example of Orange County CA to explore the New Right as a social movement at both local and national levels (12). She does not use this county as a case study in the classic sense, because with its unique demographics it does not represent other communities where the movement took hold. Instead, McGirr uses Orange County to trace the attributes of the New Right movement from its beginnings through the Reagan era. McGirr makes a game effort of providing an unbiased view of the movement, but her work is cut out for her. It is a challenge not to view the county with a degree of cynicism. The predominantly white, middle class and Protestant population (44) actively responds to perceived threats from a hodgepodge of distant and indistinct enemies to individualism, family and religion (272). But for a region whose economy is built largely on the defense industry, the Orange County anti-tax and small government stance seems more than a little incongruous and this dichotomy is never explained.
McGirr's main accomplishment is her documentation of the turning point for the New Right in between the Goldwater and Reagan era. It was during this time that the grassroots movement went national, learned to translate their John Birch rhetoric into a more modern language, and operated inside what McGirr calls "the bounds of respectable discourse (128-9)." Reagan's backers were much savvier as regards to the packaging and selling of their candidate and platform, reflecting a maturing of the movement. The New Right became a national political force when they achieved the feat of maintaining their conservative credentials while making them palatable to great mass of swing voters.
Once in her Introduction (7) and again in the middle of her text (147), McGirr makes a point of emphasizing how her approach differs from that of Richard Hofstadter, Daniel Bell and Seymour Martin Lipset. She claims that Hofstadter's causal analysis of the conservative movement is too grounded in explanations based on "physiological distress" or "personality disorders," namely fear and paranoia. Yet the words McGirr uses to describe the motivations of Orange County residents still sound very much like fear. The New Right rhetoric that she quotes is infused with apocalyptic images; "destruction of moral fiber . . . communist threat . . . collectivist menace . . . subversion . . . conspiracy . . . [welfare state as] the road to serfdom." The terms used might be moderated somewhat over the years, but the foundation is still simple fear (272). With such hyperbole at the center of the New Right philosophy, Hofstadter's characterization still appears to be not too far off the mark, and McGirr inadvertently does a good job of supporting his point.
Becky Erbelding, Spring 2010
In Suburban Warriors: The Origins of the New American Right, Lisa McGirr intended to write a "history of the conservative movement, using Orange County as the lens through which to explore the social base and ideological waters of one of the most profound transformations of twentieth-century U.S. politics" (4). While there are many strong points to the book, there are many weaknesses as well, including a major flaw in the previous sentence. McGirr's herself exposes this "transformation" of the area into a conservative bastion as one based largely on a rise in population by citizens from more traditionally conservative areas. There was no transformation, as that would imply that the political affiliation of the citizenry changed. While the area did become more conservative and there were certainly those who became more conservative, many conservatives moved into the area due to a proliferation of military and defense organizations.
Even with this fundamental flaw, McGirr's strongest sections are in the beginning of her book, as she discussed the rise of, and important changes in, grassroots conservative activism during the Goldwater campaign and Reagan's campaign for governor. Her description of the split in the Republican party during the Goldwater campaign, a split that doomed the campaign in California, is quite interesting. McGirr's description of the rise in fundamentalist religious movements in her final chapter is a strange addition to the book. While grassroots conservative movement from generalized anti-communist activism to activism based on more specific single causes, such as anti-abortion or anti-obscenity, the rise in religious fundamentalism could be a cause or an effect of the conservative movement in general. McGirr is dismissive of the movement as a genuine religious experience, focusing instead on the vast amounts of money and marketing created by these churches. As John correctly and comprehensively notes above (in a way that precludes repetition), McGirr's word choices throughout the book reveal her belief that the conservative movement in California was racist, misguided, paranoid, and extremist. While in many cases this is certainly true, and while (as John notes) she dismisses Hofstadter's thesis, she ascribes this to the entire movement, and not merely to groups like the John Birch Society.
Gwen White, Spring 2010
Lisa McGirr combines political and community history to examine the rise of conservatism in Orange County, California in the post-World War II decades. What is never overtly stated but is implied throughout the text, is the importance of the suburban landscape to this movement and how the American dream of home ownership played into the consolidation of the conservatism that we know today.
Fully planned communities provided "individual privacy, private property, and public spaces defined by consumption (p. 40)." They also created homogenous zones. Homeowners associations and assessment fees kept people with less economic buying power and perhaps differing political views out of the neighborhood and made it possible to create powerful political groups at the grassroots level through involvement with school boards and local politics.
Suburbia is a paradox. It represents a close community of like people focused on family. On the other hand it can foster racial discrimination as McGirr points out. Anti-communism, anti-semitism, and segregation in churches and schools, whether mandated or by design further fueled the separateness of the conservative community in Orange Country. The tale that McGirr relates of the determined long-range planning that led to the conservatism that exists today, is an eye-opening and impressive work
Alan S. Brody, Spring, 2011
Lisa McGirr takes on the task of writing from the point of view of the ordinary citizens who were the nucleus of the conservative right in Orange County, California. While she more than meets her stated goal of exploring the, “social base and ideological waters” of a new conservative movement I am bothered by the fact that her examples don’t include the agenda and accomplishments of the liberals. I think the text would have also benefitted from a trip North to San Francisco or even Sacramento to help contextualize her arguments. For all of the rancor expressed by the critics, I am still unclear what net effect these individuals had beyond helping elect candidates and joining societies?
I am not in any way minimizing these tasks, I am just considering another way to frame the work because in may places it reads like it wants to be a history of women or a history of the acceptance and influence of ideas. Forgive my nineteenth century spectacles, however, I see many parallels between this and reformers. McGirr locates Orange County as a place of military and technological innovation, how were those ideas expressed beyond a rabid anti-communism? She references curriculum and the PTA in passing and left me wanting more social history. The last chapter, “New Social Issues” is the strongest and I applaud her ability to weave the political possibilities and ramifications within the religious context. Her illustrations are also worthy of note as they help contextualize her argument.
As others have noted, this is an important work and one which spark passions, I endorse her political stance and believe that her interpretations are accurate and based in evidence. This is not to make wholesale judgments, instead it helps us as historians place the American Right within its own context. The people in this work seem to exist at a certain time and place and I am curious as to how that story can be rewritten in the age of social media? There is great promise in looking at the ways technology and new media have empowered her suburban warriors and the political parties and causes they serve.
Alex Bradshaw; Fall 2012
McGirr offers an interesting alternative to the history of the United States during the second half of the twentieth century. In addition to examining a movement that is often overlooked, she examines middle class whites in a rarely seen context. The "suburban warriors" of Orange County reacted to the threats that they perceived in communism, the civil rights movement, and other liberal gains that followed World War II by throwing their energy and influence into a mobilization that began a virtually uninterrupted reign of conservatism that lasted until the end of the century. Most histories of popular or grassroots movements tell the stories of struggles for rights and opportunties that are generally associated with the left ot liberals, but this history tells the story of efforts on the opposite end of the political spectrum. the men and women discussed here used many of the same types of methodologies that grassroots liberalism has, but to very different ends.
McGirr asserts that the three main components of the conservative movement of the 1960s were the creation of the Sunbelt, suburbanization, and white backlash, and that these three elements owed their creation to the liberal gains that preceded them. Although she is presenting a hisotry of the conservative movement, McGirr clearly suffers from no illusions concerning the motivations behind the movement. She acknowledges that the actors in this history were motivated by economic and class bias, racism, and religious fanaticism, but manages to do so without sounding overly condemenatory.
One particularly interesting point that McGirr makes is that the people in her study have been dismissed, both by their contemporaries and by historians, as extremists, but they crafted a trend in popular and political thought that held on to power for quite a long time. Although there were a number of failures, like Barry Goldwater's presidential campaign, the successes of the conservative movement significant and long-lasting. It is interesting how successful a white, middle class based movement could make such achievements during a time in which many types of discrimination were more popularly and consistently condemned than ever before, and when opportunities available to non-white and non-middle-class were more prevalent than they had ever been before.
Lindsey Bestebreurtje, Fall 2012
With the goal of tracing the rise of the Radical Right in American culture beginning in the 1960’s through the case study of Orange County, California Lisa McGirr’s work “Suburban Warriors” is a success. McGirr chose Orange County not for its representative qualities, but rather for its extreme zealousness toward the social conservatism, libertarian economics, Christian Evangelicalism, and commitment to a strong military that would come to define the Republican party after the 1980’s. With this choice the reader is able to see the extremes of the grassroots activists, McGirr’s suburban warriors, who would eventually come to dominate national politics.
While the book had many strengths, it did suffer from one major weakness. This can be seen in McGirr’s discussion of the impulse towards racial homogeneity in Orange County. By posing this white flight as a reaction to the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960’s, McGirr poses the issue as a black-white divide. In Southern California where there are not only large African American populations but also large Hispanic and Asian populations this was a mistake.
Despite this major weakness, the book was strong overall. Her greatest strength was in her willingness to look beyond the negative cultural portrayals of these people and this movement by many scholars and liberals. Refusing to see them as shrill or irrational, McGirr detailed the beliefs which made up the new Right’s partisan platform, including anti-communism and evangelicalism, and showed how these were not anti-modern sentiments, but rather were born out of social realities and political opinions. This can be seen in her discussion of the coalition between libertarians and social conservatives. Despite seeming to be ideologically incompatible “libertarians and social conservatives shared enough grievances against their common enemy, the liberal Leviathan, to forge a political movement.” (pp 164) These commonalities included anti-communism, a limited interpretation of the Constitution, and hostility toward social welfare. (pp 164-174) This is representative of the care used to detail the elements of this social movement which seem contradictory on its surface, moving beyond the dismissive tone which left liberals then and now unable to deal with this political threat.
I wonder how McGirr’s narrative might have been changed if printed just five years later. In the time between it’s publication in 2001 and 2006 three popular television shows which are set in Orange County emerged - The OC, The Real Housewives of Orange County, and Laguna Beach. Each of these shows focus on the exact demographic who makeup the suburban warriors. Since two are reality TV shows it could provide an interesting source to see how the political values of this era have translated into social and cultural values for a new generation of Orange County residents. Perhaps it is time for a new edition.
Sheri A. Huerta, Fall 2012
McGirr analyzes the social context of the conservative movement through the lens of Orange County, California. By isolating a particular location that developed strong patterns of support and outreach for conservative candidates, issues, and activism, McGirr attempts to identify the social and regional factors that created conditions for a conservative anticommunist awakening while also showing how the tactics changed over time to encompass broader religious imperatives and single-issue political campaigns.
McGirr’s demographical analysis of the country reveals interesting patterns. The county attracted migrants from the heartland, who brought conservative values with them and a yearning to recreate community connections that had been fractured in the westward move. Second, she contends economic connections to Cold War military-industrial complex created a heightened awareness of anticommunism sentiment that sparked “fears of federal government centralization and apprehensions over the penetration of liberal ideas into the nation’s schools, churches, and communities” (p. 55). According to McGirr, the transient nature of Orange Countians and proximity to Cold War industry created conditions conducive for activist groups like the John Birch society to rally established and informal social networks into recruitment activities and educational forums against a perceived threat of communism and liberalism. In this locale, the perceived threat first took the form of attacking school board members’ political affiliations and once small victories in changing local politics were achieved, neighborhood groups set their sights on higher goals like controlling the CRA. It is unclear the kinds of issues that were galvanizing these early local grassroots groups other than references to support for free-enterprise capitalism and a vague sense of educating the community against the “communist menace” and this is one aspect that McGirr could have clarified. Later, groups could rally around particular political candidates or specific propositions or social issues like busing, pornography, sex education, or abortion, but determining the extent of support based on polling results captures the sentiments of the voting public as a whole based on state or national issues that reached the balloting phase. An interesting discussion might be to compare county or city government records for homegrown initiatives rather than state or national platforms for town hall meetings that reveal local concerns that failed to make the ballot at higher levels of government.
McGirr points to the solidly middle and upper class cohort in the early 1960s that supported early efforts to educate against threats to the American way of life, but a point that is perhaps underscored is that these men and especially women had the leisure time and income to participate in study groups. McGirr theorizes that these women’s “identification as wives, mothers, and ‘moral guardians’ of the family” encouraged them to leave the domestic sphere in order to promote the conservative cause (p. 87). This attitude and motivation is reminiscent of white middle class social workers of the Progressive Era as depicted by Ewen in Immigrant Women in the Land of Dollars where women also left the domestic sphere to promote values-based education as an American way of life against a perceived outside (immigrant) threat. McGirr’s ability to delve into the motivations of women for joining, forming, and recruiting other women into political and militant Christian identities frames an intriguing subtext to the greater story of the collective movement within the county and a counterpoint for the feminist movement.
McGirr’s strengths come from analyzing a national movement from a local perspective, but even within this local perspective, the influences from outside the county seem to be preferred over the influences from within the county.