Author Archive

Final Summary Form

Digital Story Title:
One Hundred Years in America

Brief description:
Using the Feldman family and their descendents as a lens, the film will examine the changes that immigrant families experience over several generations.  It will start with the reason that the Feldmans—and millions of other Jews—left Eastern Europe between 1880 and 1920 and include the changes each generation thereafter faced, from trying to adjust to a new home, to balancing an immigrant parent and their heritage with being an American, to rejecting tradition in favor of blending in, and then a return to trying to balance the past with the present.

Main goal(s):
The main goal of this project is to tell the story of a particular immigrant family through the twentieth century and serve as a point of discussion on how this particular story is both unique and similar to the stories of other immigrant families.

Who is your intended audience? (e.g., colleagues, historians, art historians, the general public, high school history students, middle school music students, art students. . . )
The audience for this film is fairly open. Anyone, whether an academic or an amateur, with an interest in immigration and an Americanization during the 20th century will find this to be an interesting case study of one particular family.

Category: Final Summary  Comments off
Copyright Confusion

I started learning about copyright law last semester in Clio I.  I understand the laws.  I get that there are certain time restrictions on material and that sometimes those restrictions are ridiculously long.  The problem isn’t the laws.  It’s all the interpretations of the laws.  Technically, educational uses that won’t be making money should be considered fair use.  Of course big time companies like to make money off of everything that’s even remotely related to them (for an example see the Who Dat? Controversy)  Unfortunately, as educators, its difficult to decide what to use and what not to use.  On the one hand we could use what we want and try to claim fair use and deal with the complaints as they come (if they come).  On the other we could totally avoid using anything that is younger than 87 years and not published by the government.  Which sometimes means we have far, FAR less to work with than we expected.  I’m not sure where I stand on my project yet.  My project isn’t something that is EVER going to make me money.  It’s not something that’s going to be used in a grant proposal or for a campaign of any sort or anything like that.  So my feeling is that I’ll probably use what I want, credit everything and if I ever happen to get a cease and desist letter, I’ll cease and desist at that time.  I would be far more careful if I was actually using this to make some form of profit (whether it be through a grant or helping my community or whatever). 

And for those of you that haven’t seen it, here’s the Disney Copyright video.  Enjoy.

A Fair(y) Use Tale

Project Progress

So, I’m doing my digital story on the immigration and Americanization experience of Russian Jews, using my family’s history as a lens through which I tell the story.  I’ve got the general script written and I’ve got just about enough photographs.  I still have to write my conclusion and kind of weave the theme into the rest of the script, but I do know what my conclusion actually is, now (finally!!)   My conclusion is that just about every major immigrant group in the 19th and 20th centuries that was not the ruling elite (generally Anglo-Saxon Protestants) created their own microcommunities and through those communities eventually became Americanized, while still holding on to select cultural traditions.  Now, I just need to make that a constant theme in the script.  As for photographs, I’ve got (I believe) everything I need.  I just need to scan some of them in.  I still need to do the actual video-taped interviews, so maybe this weekend or next (I would say definitely this weekend, but it’s going to be so pretty out I can’t really guarantee that).  I think I’m well on my way, it’s just a matter of putting it together.  If anyone has any suggestions though, I’m open to them!

The Digital Study of History

Ok, so apparently I wrote this and saved it as a draft without actually posting it.  This was from our week on interactivity, so feel free to read now that I’ve actually posted it :)

I think that it’s incredibly easy for academics to sit back and “choose sides” when it comes to academia and the digital world.  Google is considered to be a prime example of how the digital world can impact historical study (along with the rest of society) and at the 2010 AHA conference there was even a session titled “Is Google Good for History?”  I chose not to go (there was a session of Film Historiography and Geographies of American Memory) but one of the women I went to the conference with did go, just to see what was said.  We’d both had Clio where we discussed this question ad nauseum, and the general outcome was people either loved it (because it made access so easy) or hated it (because you never knew how accurate anything you found would be).  Personally I fall in the middle.  I think Google is great.  I think that Wikipedia is great.  I think that any digital access to historical sources is great.  But I also know that it comes with a price.  Google is great for searching topics out, but it’s not going to give you a whole bunch of primary resources (Google Books, however, will provide you with tons of secondary sources, including bibliographies).  Wikipedia is great for getting background and links to other, more academic, sources, but it’s not exactly trust worthy (although in some instances it was surprisingly accurate—see the article “Can History be Open Source?” by Roy Rosenzweig).  Digital access to primary sources (such as what you get with ProQuest) are far more likely to be useful to academic historian, but their OCR is atrocious so you never know if you’re getting what you’re actually looking for.  Everything has its downside.  That’s part of life and academic study is no different.  Using digital resources, collaborating with others to study history is an amazing method of historical study.  Twenty years ago, some of the things I’ve researched would have taken far more time, far more money and far more work to get a paper that probably would not have been nearly as well-researched.  But with the internet, I’m able to see newspapers, books, letters and images online that I never would have immediate access to had I just had access to the GMU library.  This isn’t to say I don’t spend time in archives.  As an academic historian, it’s impossible to avoid them.  But I’m able to Google a topic, and find all sorts of sources that I would never have even thought to look at on my own, then go find them in an archive and go down the rabbit-hole from there.

Category: Uncategorized, W9: Interactivity  Comments off
Final Project

So, since we’re supposed to post about our final project I’m going to try to do this and have it make as much sense as possible.  What I plan to do is study the Americanization process of Eastern European Jews who immigrated to the United States and the subsequent generations.  My great grandmother emigrated from Russia with her family as a young girl and using her story and that of my grandmother (her daughter), mother and me, I’ll look at the changes from generation to generation in their connections to Russia, Judaism, Israel, Baltimore (where they settled), the outside world (generally speaking, non-Pikesville-Jews) and each other.

I haven’t written a script yet, or done a huge amount of actual research.  Mostly what I have is the stories I’ve heard about 50 times each, so I’m going to have to actually sit down with my mother and grandmother and record the stories so that I can come up with a cohesive storyline.  The general story-arc though will be that many things changed from generation to generation, but there are a few things that have remained the same.  Lena Feldman Gold (my greatgrandmother) emigrated to the US as a girl, so she was truly a Russian Jew who was trying to make her way in the US.

My grandmother, Maxine Gold Rosenthal, was born in the US, grew up in a Jewish neighborhood and kind of had to balance being the child of an immigrant (with a grandmother who never spoke a word of English), a Jew and an American (she grew up during the Depression and World War II–which fostered a lot of patriotism). 

My mother was kind of the wild child.  She grew up in the Jewish neighborhood, but never really fit in.  She (in her own words) had “issues” with the hebrew language–so while all her friends were having their Bat Mitzvah ceremonies (coming of age) by being called up to read the Torah (the Hebrew bible) she had to have hers at an Orthodox synagogue since they didn’t allow girls to actually read from the Torah.  Pretty much as soon as she got the chance she left behind the Jewish neighborhood and married a convert (which, in some circles is as bad as marrying a non-Jew). 

I (third generation American) was raised in a non-Jewish neighborhood, had very few Jewish friends but ended up feeling more connected to Judaism than my mother.  I was the first to have a modern Bat Mitzvah where I actually read the Torah (they just didn’t happen when my grandmother and great-grandmother were girls) and while my mother never visited Israel, I went as soon as I got the opportunity (at age 18).  

In addition to the differences, there were some similarities, including items passed down from generation to generation–including a candlestick that my great-great grandmother brought from Russia, gave to Lena, who gave it to Maxine, who gave it to me at 18 (since mother didn’t really want it).  Also, I’ll briefly discuss Camp Louise and Camp Airy–two summer camps in Western Maryland that were created as summer retreats in the 1920s for Jews living in Baltimore to escape the city for a bit and were later converted to summer camps for Jewish children.  My grandmother worked at Camp Airy (as did her sister-in-law), my mother attended Camp Louise before working there as a counselor and met my father there while he worked at Airy, and finally my brother and I both attended camp there, as did several cousins.

As for order, I’ll start with a quick description of why a lot of Jews left Eastern Europe around the last turn of the century, go into the americanization process, and finish with a brief round-up of how this can compare to other immigrant groups. 

Since this video will really just be for class and a private audience, I’m not so concerned about copyright issues.  As such, I plan to use at least four different songs.  For each time period (immigration, first generation, second generation, third generation) I’ll use music that will come from each time period for flavor.  In addition, I hope to use a clip from Liberty Heights. This was a movie done in 1999 about the Jewish neighborhood of that name (where my grandmother grew up) in Baltimore during the 1950s.  I haven’t seen it in years, but I have it and hopefully I’ll find a decent clip that will just highlight how people in the neighborhood behaved and thought.

I also hope to include interviews.  It’ll take some juggling and luck, but I think I might be able to pull it off.  We don’t have a digital video camera, so I’d have to rent one from STAR but, of course, my grandmother lives about an hour and a half away so the 6 hour time limit isn’t going to work, and my parents (who live a half hour from campus) can’t actually do it during the week.  According to their site, if you check equipment out after 3 on Friday you can have it till Monday morning (which is where the luck comes in), so we’ll see.

So that’s probably a lot longer than it needs to be and is probably really confusing, so if you have any questions, feel free to ask.  I also welcome suggestions, of course.  I have tons more stories and all but it’s a matter of choosing which to include and which to leave out.  Now, I’m going to go and try to come up witha  script for next week.

America’s National Parks

So, I totally spent WAAAAY too much time working on this.  It was just kind of addictive.  I’ve always loved the song Big Yellow Taxi by Joni Mitchell and thought that photos of natural scenes would be a really cool montage for it.  Well, then this assignment comes along and I went with it.  I took a photograph from a national park in each state (so 50 photos) and organized them to go along with the song.  At first, I was planning to just kinda throw them together and be done with it, but then a couple of photos seemed to fall at just the right point in the song.  So I had to make sure that lots of photos did that (because that would be so cool right?)  So I spent most of Sunday afternoon and evening and Monday evening playing with it.  What I’ve got isn’t totally perfect (in my mind) but it’s close and I really like it.  So, without further ado, here it is.

Category: W5: Animoto  2 Comments
Murder at Harvard’s Place as History

The documentary that we watched in class was a far more reliable source of information about the murder of George Parkman than Simon Schama’s book, Dead Certainties, was.  When it comes to historical writing, historians generally don’t trust anything that doesn’t have footnotes, and Dead Certainties, certainly had none of those.  As a historian, I liked the film better because there was a more distinct division between fact and fiction and Schama pointed out the specific parts he came up with in his own mind.  Schama’s blending of fact and fiction is a fantastic way to bring people into the history of story without being the typically boring facts-only history.  While I think that the style of historical writing that Schama uses definitely has its place, that place isn’t really an academic setting. 

I have no problem with this kind of historical writing or even historical movies.  I think that if we, as historians, force the public to see and read historical fiction that is completely historically accurate, or refuse to consult with film directors and authors that do not plan to have a completely historically accurate final product, then there is no future to history as a profession.  I don’t know anyone who picked up The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire at the age of 10 (or 40 for that matter) and fell in love with history.  However, I know a lot of people who went to Williamsburg and came away wanting to learn about Colonial America, or who saw Casablanca or Schindler’s List and wanted to learn more about World War II.  Historians constantly complain that “people” know nothing about history, and no, most will never have a specific specialty and know every detail about it.  But as historians, we will never get anyone interested in any aspect of history with straight historical fact.  So, while Schama’s style of historical writing does not belong in an academic setting, where people are specifically looking for historical fact, it does have a place as history for the other 99.9% of the population.

Can I Go Back?

 

Category: W3: 5 Photos  2 Comments
Defining DST–Nailing Jelly to the Wall

If there’s anything that’s become obvious in the last couple classes, it’s that defining digital storytelling is like nailing the proverbial jelly to the wall.  There is no one complete, all-encompassing definition for DST and each person has their own idea of what it could be.  Digital storytelling is generally a method of telling a story that requires some form of new media (video, photography, computers) as opposed to old media (generally, paper).  It’s typically a montage of video and photography with a narrative and music as a soundtrack.  Of course, there are also digital stories that use only video or only photography, while others use only a narrative or only music (although those are generally seen as bad examples of how to tell a digital story).  Then there are the ones that instead of using photography or video, use drawings—such as the online cartoon that Mike showed us last week in his posting.  Or the ones that use speeches or other pre-recorded non-narratives as their soundtrack rather than an actual story—such as the Kennedy speech I shared last week in my posting.  In addition to all of these elements, the written word can also be added to emphasize certain points, as in some of the examples we saw in the first night of class.  So, in conclusion, digital storytelling can include photographs, video, artwork, text, music, narrative, and other sound-recordings.  Or only some of these items.  At its most basic definition, digital storytelling requires some visual item, some aural item and some sort of theme—and hopefully a point.

Category: W3: What is Digital Storytelling?  Comments off
President Kennedy’s “Moon” Speech

The digital story that I chose is actually about 14 seconds longer than 5 minutes, but I really liked it (and the other one that I really liked was 9 minutes), so I went with it.  This digital story doesn’t have any credits attributed to it, nor does it have an actual title, other than a brief explanation of what it is that the audience is listening to.  It uses President John F. Kennedy’s speech about the United States aiming for a trip to the moon at Rice University in September, 1962 as both its script and only audio. 

The storyteller then uses images that pertain to what Kennedy is specifically talking about to illustrate the points.  Rather than going in a necessarily chronological order he tries to match what Kennedy says with images that are available, whether they are images from the actual space race itself, from the Apollo mission, or other images that stress the point.  The images used vary from cave paintings and renaissance artwork to photographs of astronauts and other planets and galaxies.

I think that hearing the audio of the actual speech adds to the power of the images far more than having either the digital storyteller narrating words or music in the background.  While a narration would probably provide more context and carefully chosen music could be powerful, hearing the actual speech, of the excellent orator that Kennedy was, offers a unique feeling.

As for what type of digital story it is, I suppose it would be considered a both a narrative story and persuasive.  The speech itself was a fairly persuasive argument for America striving to visit the moon, while the images used serve to illustrate the arguments that Kennedy was making.  It was different from the stories we watched in class because it was not a scripted story or a lesson of some sort, it was a speech that most Americans are at least somewhat familiar with that now has photographs added to it in order to give it more depth.

The story is available from the University of Houston’s Educational Uses of Digital Storytelling website.  It can be found here.