The best way to get a feel for how Holmes worked, and therefore, how historians work, is to read an account of his efforts. Although there are many dozen chapters in Holmes' casebook, we will read Silver Blaze. As you read, take careful note of the process Holmes follows...that is, how he acquires various pieces of evidence and what he does with them, how he tests various theories, and so on. In particular, note the passages that I have highlighted in bold type about the dog that did not bark.

When you are done, take a few minutes to reflect on what lessons you can learn from this story that you will be able to apply to your study of history in the coming semester. In particular, ask yourself how Holmes' method differed from your own as you investigated the murder of William Robinson. Blog your responses prior to our class on January 28.

Sir Basil Rathbone as Sherlock Holmes	The Detective Process
	Blog
	Section 021 Section 024
Like a good detective, a good historian is concerned first and foremost with facts. Any explanation of what happened must be supported by evidence, otherwise it is pure opinion. While there is certainly a place for opinion in the writing of history, opinions not supported by the facts get shot down very quickly and have little or no influence (and generally result in reduced grades). Your first task as you begin to think like a historian is to learn how to think like a detective. Although he is a creation of the novelist Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, Sherlock Holmes remains the model for the modern criminal detective. His devotion to facts, his belief that one cannot form theories until one is in full command of the facts, and his creativity when faced with a lack of facts, would make any historian proud.
Last modified January 23, 2008