|
|
Over the next few months, the parliamentary leadership faced constant
criticism from the more radical faction of deputies in the Convention
(known as "the Mountain" because they sat in the higher seats,
to the left of the rostrum), as well as the radical press and sans-culottes
in the sectional assemblies. The Mountain included Jacobins and members
of other important clubs. In early 1793 several divisive decisions cost
the Girondins much of their following in Paris: their opposition to the
execution of the King, their support for General Charles-François
Dumouriez (who defected to the enemy), their efforts to stabilize the
currency by slowing the resale of confiscated lands, and their opposition
to regulating grain markets to bring down bread prices in the capital.
On each measure, the Mountain proved unrelentingly critical in its speeches
and press, until finally, on 31 May 1793, the people of Parisled
by the Cordelier Club and other radical orators who had inspired many
sectional assembliesbroke the deadlock by surrounding the Convention's
meeting hall and demanding the expulsion of the Girondins. Even though
the radicals in the Convention hesitated before complying with such extra-parliamentary
direct violence, they offered no real resistance. After three tense days,
the crowd succeeded in shifting leadership in the Convention to the more
radical deputies.
The radicals' direction of the government gave new strength and force
to the popular movement in Paris, as the militants in the sections now
perceived themselves to be responsible for saving the Republic from its
enemies, both foreign and domestic. The Convention's deputies took a different
view, worrying that the continual tumult in the streets could render the
country ungovernable. Yet they could do little to address this concern
because of the continuing threat of civil and foreign wars. Only after
that peril diminished could the Mountain begin to deal with the enormous
influence of the Parisian popular movement. In late 179394 the leaders
of the Convention (organized in a "Committee of Public Safety")
silenced their most active popular supporters in Paris. The Committee
arrested and executed such radical club leaders as Jacques-René
Hébert and Jacques Roux and shut down the sections that had provided
the organizational basis for the sans-culottes. Even so, Maximilien
Robespierre and his collaborators on the Committee of Public Safety remained
popular with Parisian artisans and laborers, although the workers became
increasingly disillusioned and disorganized and less able to function
as a powerful political force. Finally, on 9 Thermidor Year II (27 July
1794), capitalizing on a split within the ruling Committee of Public Safety,
former supporters of the executed revolutionary orator Georges Danton
and radicals disappointed with current directions in the committee persuaded
the Plain to reject Robespierre's strident advocacy of judicial terror
as a means of ruling the country and acted to depose the Mountain. Robespierre
and his followers no longer could look for a mobilization of sans-culottes
in the streets or for the press to intimidate their foes into silence.
The artisans would rise again during the revolutionary decade, but never
to the same degree and certainly not with the same success as before.
Popular political activism consisted of more than just the great journées
(day-long demonstrations), of course; workers attended sectional and club
meetings. Whereas the earliest "clubs" had drawn educated professionals
to debate leading questions of the day, the sections were more popular
and activist bodies. Although the Parisian sections exercised only limited
power at first, they gained considerable strength as centers of dissent,
which made successive revolutionary legislatures fear them. During the
Revolution's most radical months, from September 1793 to July 1794, when
the Committee of Public Safety controlled the Convention, the sections
of Paris declared themselves in "permanent session" and assumed
local administrative direction of the Terror, exercising political and
juridical functions at the neighborhood level. To encourage participation
by workers, the radical leaders of the Conventionat Danton's behestpaid
people a stipend to attend sectional assemblies. Only in late 1793 did
the Convention reverse course and seek to weaken these bodies.
In these dramatic months, sans-culottes also had their own clubs
and participated in such formerly bourgeois clubs as the Jacobins and
especially the Cordeliers, which became leading voices for artisans and
provided a direct link between the working people of Paris and the Mountain's
deputies in the Convention. In the early years of the Revolution, clubs
also provided an important venue where womenexcluded throughout
the period from full citizenship rightscould participate in Revolutionary
politics. When the Convention acted to limit popular radical political
activism in late 1793, however, it repressed women's clubs with particular
ardor. Contemporary views of popular participation in clubs varied, with
supporters defending them as instances of popular democracy and as schools
of constitutional procedure and critics attacking them as artificial and
divisive centers since they distracted the people from their true allegiance
to the "nation."
|
|