| |
|
|
|
|
|
Having defeated Austria and recognizing that an invasion of Great Britain
was impossible, the leaders of the French government encouraged the very
popular Bonaparte to look for other means of striking at England, in part,
just to get him out of the way. When he suggested invading Egypt as a
means of threatening the English position in India, Bonaparte was given
permission to push ahead with the idea. In 1798, Napoleon led a sizable
army and much of the French fleet across the Mediterranean. Although Egypt
swiftly fell to French arms, Bonaparte's army was stranded there by Admiral
Horatio Nelson's decisive naval victory at Aboukir Bay. Rather than remain
sequestered in Egypt, Bonaparte abandoned his army to return to France,
where his heroic reputation and military prowess was bolstered by slick
propaganda and a considerable amount of war booty.
Bringing the Revolution to a Close?
After five years of upheaval, the Revolution had left France divided,
angry, and distrusting but in need of central authority. In the fall of
1794, the Convention, no longer controlled by the Committee of Public
Safety and with the surviving Girondin deputies restored to it, resumed
its efforts to draft a constitution. The Convention recognized that the
rule of law had to be restored if the authority of the government was
to recover from the effects of the Terror. With the Girondin deputies
reinstated, however, there was no question of implementing the "Montagnard"
Constitution of 1793. Instead, a new constitutionthat of the Year
III (1795)was written. This document clearly intended to preserve
the political power of the socioeconomic elite, through the reimposition
of property restrictions for officeholding and the suffrage. Social equality
was notably absent because Jacobin ideas on democracy were tarnished with
the reputation of being inherently dangerous to the rule of law and likely
to result in Terror. The new government invested the lion's share of power
in an executive body, the Directory, composed of a rotating committee
of five "Directors," who would preside over a bicameral legislature,
an upper chamber named the Anciens (Elders)all of whose members
had to be at least forty years old, to ensure their maturity of judgmentand
a lower house known as "the Five Hundred."
The Convention's distrust of the polity was revealed most clearly in
a decree requiring two-thirds of the deputies to the next legislature
to be members of the Convention. Recognizing that this measure would leave
radicals in charge of the government, some royalist-influenced sections
revolted in Vendémiaire, Year IV (October 1795). The army put down
the rising under the command of Napoleon Bonaparte. (This loyal action
won him his command in Italy.) Thus the directorial regime came to power
with military support and would remain dependent on that support to survive.
During its four years in power (November 1795 to December 1799), the
Directory consistently faced challenges to its legitimacy, not only from
the heirs of the Jacobins on the Left, but also from returning émigré
nobles demanding restitution of their property; conservative street gangs
known as the "gilded youth," who were anxious to harass former
terrorists; and a revived armed mobilization in the west of Chouans acting
in coordination with the English and with other émigré
nobles led by the Count of Provence, who now claimed the throne as Louis
XVIII.
Yet the most significant threat to the Directory's stability lay within
the framework of the new constitution, as the elections of 1797the
first in which no former Convention deputies would be incumbent for reelectionreturned
a royalist majority divided between those who favored a constitutional
monarchy and those who demanded a restoration of the old regime. The Directors
attempted to steer a middle course, believing that their primary responsibility
was to preserve a moderate republic, which meant keeping both royalists
and Jacobins out of power. Preferring stability to democracy, the Directors
annulled the electoral results from the Year V in a coup on 18 Fructidor
(September 1797). This same strategy would be used in the Year VI (1798)
against the Jacobin movement, which had been permitted to reform political
clubs known as Constitutional Circles. A coup of Floréal Year VI
(May 1798) showed that the pendulum of political opinion was behaving
erratically and could readily shift from radical Left to Right, and vice
versa.
|
|