| |
Fears of the White Unconscious: Music, Race,
and Identification
in the Censorship of "Cop Killer"
By Barry Shank
from RHR 66, Fall 1996On June 11, 1992,
the Dallas Police Association and the Combined Law Enforcement Association of Texas called
a press conference to announce the beginning of a campaign to force Warner Brothers
Records to remove a song entitled "Cop Killer" from one of their current
releases by the heavy metal band, Body Count. Within a week, the Texan groups had received
the support of police organizations in California and New York. The governor of the state
of Alabama, Guy Hunt, asked all record stores in his state to stop selling Body Count's
album. The Vice President of the country, Dan Quayle, termed the song "obscene."
Sixty members of Congress signed a letter addressed to Warner Brothers calling the
recording "despicable" and "vile." Within two weeks, the California
State Attorney General had sent a letter to record store chains operating in California,
requesting that they no longer stock the recording. Over 1,500 stores across the country
had already pulled the album from their shelves and refused to sell it. Within a month of
the initial press conference, President George Bush publicly denounced any record company
that would release such a product. At a Time Warner shareholder's meeting on July 16,
actor Charlton Heston stood up, read the lyrics to two songs from the album and demanded
that the nation's largest media corporation take some action. Then, on July 28, Ice-T, the
leader of the band, Body Count, called a press conference to announce that he personally
was removing the song, "Cop Killer," from all future copies of the album.
In less than two months, a protest against a pop
song begun by a 1,000 member organization of police officers had forced one of the world's
largest and most successful corporations not only to pull one of their still profitable
products from the marketplace, but to go back on several carefully worded public
statements supporting artistic freedom and freedom of speech. Finally, on January 27,
1993, Warner Bros. released both Ice-T (solo) and Body Count from their recording
contracts, citing "creative differences."(1)
How did this happen? What mechanisms of American
mass mediated popular culture enabled the proponents of the boycott to achieve their
goals? And why did this happen? What were the social, historical and, above all, musical
conditions that enabled this one four-minute song to appear so threatening? In order to
answer these questions, I will approach an analysis of the musical as well as lyrical text
of "Cop Killer" through the particular yet pervasive contexts of similar mass
cultural products as well as media representations of the 1992 Los Angeles rebellion.
In the months following the uprising in Los
Angeles, as the nation struggled to understand the meaning of the event and explain its
causes, "Cop Killer" became the cultural text that most clearly focused the
opposing interpretations of the Los Angeles rebellion. Briefly, the two positions lined up
as follows: was the rebellion the result of increasingly harsh social conditions creating
the fuel that was ignited by an unjust jury verdict? or were the rebellion and, indeed,
the harsh social conditions themselves, the products of a "pathological" black
culture? I will argue that "Cop Killer" (and no other cultural product) became
the object of a successful censorship campaign because it produced a structure of
identification for white listeners that tapped into some of the deepest fears of the white
unconscious. By presenting "gangsta" rap lyrics within the musical context of a
guitar-driven heavy metal song, "Cop Killer," encouraged white listeners to
identify with black rage. As it blended racially marked subjectivities this song rendered
inadequate the simple explanations of the Los Angeles rebellion that were being put forth
by both Democrat and Republican candidates in the months preceding the 1992 presidential
elections. If suburban white males could find pleasure and meaning in "Cop
Killer's" evocation of rage and revenge, then the Los Angeles rebellion could not be
simply the result of a "pathological" black culture. By virtue of its musically
produced structure of identification, "Cop Killer" suggested that the entire
nation could understand inner-city black rage and, further, that the society in general
bore responsibility for the conditions that produced it. It was this articulation of
repressed and contradictory elements of suburban white male identity with the equally
unspeakable fears aroused by the Los Angeles rebellion that forced the censorship of
"Cop Killer."
LOS ANGELES, 1992
The story of "Cop Killer" and its
censorship is inextricably imbricated with the occurrences in Los Angeles during late
April and early May of 1992. On April 29, a jury in suburban Simi Valley acquitted the
police officers who had beaten Rodney King, and the streets of South Central Los Angeles
exploded in fury. President Bush's address to the nation on May 1 stressed the dominant
conservative interpretation of the events.
What we saw last night and the night before in
Los Angeles is not about civil rights. It's not about the great cause of equality that all
Americans must uphold. It's not a message of protest. It's been the brutality of mob, pure
and simple. And let me assure you, I will use whatever force is necessary to restore
order.(2)
In a commencement speech delivered to a small
college in the Los Angeles area, candidate for the Republican presidential nomination, Pat
Buchanan, asked, "But where did the mob come from?" Among the responsible
origins of this "mob," Buchanan asserted, "It came out of rock concerts
where rap music celebrates raw lust and cop-killing."(3)
Ice-T himself was interviewed by the Los Angeles
Times while the riots were taking place. He said, I'm not saying I told you so, but
rappers have been reporting from the front for years...Black people look at cops as the
Gestapo. People thought it might come to an end [with the Rodney King trial] and they
might get some justice. That was a false hope. People saw that justice is a myth if you're
black. Of course people will riot.(4)
From the perspective of Pat Buchanan, rap music
had functioned as a cultural agent, producing the illogical violence of the riots. While
according to Ice-T, rappers had been reporting on the material and ideological conditions
that, in fact, did predictably produce the rebellion. The public mediated battle over
"Cop Killer" was precisely the struggle over which of these two interpretations
would become the dominant meaning of the events in Los Angeles.
GANGSTA RAP
Before the rebellion, Ice-T was enjoying a
successful solo music career, having released four rap albums since his debut in 1987.
Each of these albums focuses on stories of drug-dealing, pimping and gang warfare,
featuring an outlaw or "gangsta" image which he carefully cultivates. One
interviewer recently commented on the nice furnishings in Ice-T's home in the Hollywood
Hills and asked him who did his decorating. The singer responded, "I did. I broke
into enough houses to know how people decorate."(5)
Ice-T's fourth solo rap album, released in late
May, 1991, is entitled O.G. Orginal Gangster. This title refers to his ongoing feud
(or marketplace competition) with fellow Los Angeles rappers, N.W.A., and establishes
Ice-T as a veteran of the gangsta scene.(6) Ice-T claims to have
invented gangsta rap, although N.W.A. and its associated spin-offs have achieved greater
commercial success within the genre. His first album, Rhyme Pays, (1987) contains
two of the most powerful early gangsta raps, "6 in the Morning" and
"Squeeze the Trigger," and Ice-T codified the conventions of the genre in the
"powerful and dangerous" title song to Dennis Hopper's film, Colors.(7) But it was N.W.A. who sold over two million copies of their 1988
recording, Straight Outta Compton, certifying the commercial appeal of these
representations.(8)
Through the work of N.W.A., Ice-T, and others
during the late 1980s, gangsta rap established itself as one logical extreme of inner-city
African-American male musical expression. Drawing upon a long tradition of celebrating the
exploits of tough bad men like Stackolee, gangsta rap is aimed at a hypothetical
"street" audience that demands brutal lyrical imagery as a "hard- fought
badge of urban authenticity."(9) Ice Cube, one of the original
members of N.W.A. (who has since gone on to have a successful solo career) has said that,
Most of the rap records at the time [of Straight
Outta Compton] avoided cuss words and stuff like that because they wanted to get on
the radio. But we were just trying to appeal to our own crowd...the homeboys down the
street. We needed to talk about stuff that other people are scared to talk about. People
sometimes act as if we are making up the stuff we talk about on the records...that we are
trying to be controversial and shocking. It is controversial and shocking, but it's also
real ... Not the kind of stuff you [usually] hear on TV or the radio. We're speaking in
the language of the neighborhood. The homeboys know exactly what we're saying. Most
[whites] don't know what goes on in this world. They don't see these streets."(10)
Ice Cube's statement represents both the power
and the paradoxical responsibility of gangsta rap. The adoption by these young men of
racist stereotypes of the angry and appetitive black male carries a double burden. Within
the immediate community of these musicians, the complex and contradictory messages of
their music are interpreted by means of the surrounding context: the symbolic assertion of
individual street power signifies the difficult maintenance of personal dignity. In order
for their raps to sound fresh for this audience (which is key to maintaining their
legitimacy as voices for this audience), gangstas must be continually pushing the edge
--both musically and lyrically--of their genre. Outside of this community, however, their
exaggeration of exaggeration begins to fascinate with the appeal of a horror movie.
Recognized as fantasies (that is, as a form of mediated representations equivalent at one
level to television programs), the lyrics of gangsta rap provide a symbolic means of
working out real cultural tensions. Yet, when treated as "real," as somehow
representing the literal as opposed to the symbolic truth of inner-city life, these lyrics
can appear to reinforce the worst racist fears of the white unconscious. Because of its
position staked at the very edge of acceptability, because of its willingness to dance on
the highwire of racist representation, gangsta rap and its associated imagery are often
used by white middle-class cultural commentators--journalists, religious leaders and
politicians--to stand in for all of rap, and sometimes for all of African-American popular
music.(11)
For example, in a March 1990 cover story called
"The Rap Attitude," Newsweek decried rap as "The Culture of
Attitude... bombastic, self-aggrandizing and yet as scary as sudden footsteps in the
dark." The article quoted isolated lyrics from N.W.A. and Ice-T, illustrating an
apparently foreign culture of intense hatred and violence for its middle class readers.
Striving to emphasize a relationship of radical otherness between its readers and the
participants in this cultural practice, Newsweek declared that:
Attitude primarily is a working-class and
underclass phenomenon, a response to the diminishing expectations of the millions of
American youths who forgot to go to business school in the 1980s. If they had ever
listened to anything except the homeboys talking trash, if they had ever studied anything
but the strings of a guitar, they might have some more interesting justifications to
offer...The end of attitude is nihilism, which by definition leads nowhere. The culture of
attitude is repulsive, but it's mostly empty of political content.(12)
In this article, gangsta rap exemplifies the
"repulsive" culture of the "underclass" (a term that signifies urban
working-class African-Americans), the culture of those who "forgot" to go to
business school and who have, therefore, chosen "nihilism." The degree of
misunderstanding could not be greater.
There can be no doubt that the Los Angeles
rebellion reoriented white America's response to African-American music in general and to
rap in particular. At that point rappers began to be listened to as the responsible
representatives of and voices for an otherwise neglected inner-city population, one that
apparently possessed the potential to turn into a violent mob.(13)
David Mills interviewed an outspoken rap artist, Sister Souljah, for the Washington Post.
His pointed questioning drew a response that flashed across newspaper headlines for weeks,
echoes of which became a soundbite in Bill Clinton's campaign for the presidency. After
grilling Sister Souljah on the responsibility of African-American artists to their
community and to the nation at large, Mills asked, "But the people perpetrating that
violence, did they think it was wise? Was that wise, reasoned action?" Souljah's
response is worth quoting in full, insofar as it re-establishes the context for one
particular phrase that resonated in the media with one of the fears of the white
unconscious--that there would be shared costs for ongoing racial inequality.
Yeah, it was wise. I mean, if black people kill
black people every day, why not have a week and kill white people? You understand what I'm
saying? In other words, white people, this government and that mayor were well aware of
the fact that black people were dying every day in Los Angeles under gang violence. So if
you're a gang member and you would normally be killing somebody, why not kill a white
person? Do you think that somebody thinks that white people are better, or above dying,
when they would kill their own kind?(14)
The charged statement lifted from this quote was
"Why not have a week and kill white people?" The susceptibility of Souljah's
extensive response to such savage editing only highlights the burden media institutions
placed on African-American artists both to "explain" the rebellion and to take
responsibility for its immediate consequences.(15)
ON WITH THE BODY COUNT
During the summer of 1991, months before the
rebellion, Ice-T's heavy metal band, Body Count, had toured the nation as part of the
Lollapalooza package of touring bands that combined "alternative" rock acts like
Jane's Addiction, with hardcore industrial music, speed metal bandsm and rap musicians. At
every stop on that tour, they played "Cop Killer," undeniably one of their most
powerful songs. Apparently, no police organization felt threatened by the band's
performances on this tour; certainly, no efforts were made to prevent Body Count from
playing this soon to be notorious song. The following fall, the band went into the studio
to produce their album; the recorded version of "Cop Killer" included direct
references to the Rodney King incident. The album was released in late March 1992 and
first entered the Billboard "Pop Album" chart at number 32 in the issue dated
April 18. In the next week's chart, it dropped to number 39, and then hovered in the
middle forties for the following month. The album was not a smash, but neither was it a
flop. Due to Body Count's willful blurring of genres (was this a metal or a rap record?),
Warner Brothers was having trouble marketing the recording. And because of its ubiquitous
profanity, the album could not gain the radio exposure necessary to scale the heights of
commercial popularity. In the face of these problems, it was performing respectably well.
It is important to emphasize that the events in Los Angeles had no immediate noticeable
effect on the popularity of the recording. By June 6, it had sold approximately 211,000
copies. As of this June 20th chart, the Body Count album was resting at number 66.(16)
THE CENSORSHIP CAMPAIGN
On June 12, the day after the police
organizations in Texas called their initial press conference, Los Angeles city council
woman Joan Milke Flores introduced a motion calling for Time Warner to
"voluntarily" stop selling "Cop Killer." In addition to holding her
seat on the council, Flores was running for the House of Representatives from the 36th
Congressional District. After the strategic decisions of both the Bush and the Clinton
presidential campaigns, it had become evident that taking a stand against certain
African-American musicians could take the place of a reasoned and careful response to the
racial and economic tensions that underlay the Los Angeles rebellion. Flores called all
the radio stations in town asking them not to play "Cop Killer," a completely
ridiculous request since no stations would play it anyway. But she made certain that the
major news organizations in Los Angeles knew that she had taken this step.(17)
In the article that reported Flores' actions, the following lyrics from "Cop
Killer" were printed: "I got my 12-gauge sawed off/I got my headlights turned
off/I'm bout to bust some shots off/I'm bout to dust some cops off."(18)
Within less than a week, that four-line stanza had become the dominant media
representation of "Cop Killer." The very same process that reduced Sister
Souljah's extensive explanation of street ethics to a one-phrase battle cry reduced
"Cop Killer" to this verse. In the newspaper articles that covered the
controversy, these four lines were repeated over and over again, where they were allowed
to stand in for the meaning of Body Count's music and, by extension, for the threats to
civil order represented by gangsta rap, the riots in Los Angeles, along with the nation's
very real racial tensions and economic and social inequality that simply were not being
directly addressed.(19)
On June 15, the Los Angeles Police Protective
Order and the Fraternal Order of Police joined city council member Flores in calling for
Time Warner to stop selling "Cop Killer." Bill Volante, the president of the
8,000 member Los Angeles Police Union, said, "The publication of such vile trash is
unconscionable. This song does nothing but arouse the passions of the criminal element who
make the streets of Los Angeles unsafe." Blythely ignoring the musical fact that
"Cop Killer" was not a rap song, Paul Taylor, president of the Fraternal Order
of Police, said, "People who ride around all night and use crack cocaine and listen
to rap music that talks about killing cops-- it's bound to pump them up. No matter what
anybody tells you, this kind of music is dangerous." In these public statements
issued by national police organizations, "Cop Killer" stands in for rap music,
which stands in for black culture generally, and the "criminal element" equals
those "who make the streets of Los Angeles unsafe," in other words, the rioting
"mob" of the previous spring. Furthermore, this criminal element can be
recognized by three kinds of behavior: 1) they ride in cars at night; 2) they use crack
cocaine; 3) they listen to rap music that pumps them up. Not only does this sound almost
"as scary as sudden footsteps in the dark," but these police statements simply
affirm the critiques raised by Ice-T and the other gangsta rappers: when police see young
blacks listening to rap music in cars at night, the young people are assumed prima
facie to be using cocaine and to be part of the criminal element. These statements
play off the assumption that certain aspects of black culture are signs of criminality.
For "Cop Killer" to fit neatly into this crooked syllogism, it must be referred
to as a "rap song;" its musical appeal to white fans of heavy metal must be
completely repressed.(20)
Time Warner summed up their position on the
controversy with this statement issued on June 15:
It is vital that we stand by our commitment to
the free expression of ideas for all our authors, journalists, recording artists,
screenwriters, actors and directors. Just banning the song will not make violence and rage
disappear. In fact only the open discussion and exchange of ideas and information can lead
to the kind of substantive change that [police groups], Time Warner and all concerned
citizens desire.(21)
This call for calm and reasoned debate carried
none of the emotional weight of the police statements and had no chance to counteract the
racist fears coded into them. It tried to cast the controversy as one of free speech and
free markets, when those really weren't the issues at all.
On June 16, the day that the governor of Alabama
asked stores in his state not to sell the album, the National Black Police Association
denounced the censorship efforts. Spokesperson Ronald Hampton said, "This song is not
a call for murder. It's a rap of protest. Ice-T isn't just making this stuff up. He's
expressing his concerns about police misconduct. He's responding to a very real issue that
affects many Americans, especially blacks and Latinos: police brutality."(22)
The next day, House Minority Whip Newt Gingrich
and House Minority Leader Bob Michel sent a letter to Time Warner that was signed by 60
members of Congress--57 Republicans and 3 Southern Democrats--that roundly criticized the
company. "It appears you have chosen potential profit over any reasonable sense of
public responsibility. We believe that your decision to disseminate these despicable
lyrics advocating the murder of police officers is unconscionable." On June 19, the
same day that Vice President Dan Quayle denounced "Cop Killer" at a conference
of the National Association of Radio Talk Show Hosts, three major record store chains,
Trans World Music, Super Club Music and Sound Warehouse with over 1,000 stores among them
announced that they were pulling the record from their shelves. The following morning, two
more major chains, Camelot Music and Hastings Music followed suit, increasing the number
of boycotting stores to over 1,500. A vice president for Hastings Music, Walter Miller
said, "The concern came when it got so much publicity. That caused all of these
elected officials and district attorneys to get concerned...I suspect it would still be in
our stores if the media hadn't made such an event out of it."(23)
Ice-T's first public comments on the controversy
came on June 18th, during a press conference that preceded his keynote speech at the New
Music Seminar, an annual meeting of music industry personnel in New York City. When asked
about the proper response to "Cop Killer," he said, "I think cops should
feel threatened. I feel threatened. I grew up threatened. They should know that they can't
take a life without retaliation." Despite this threatening social context, however,
Ice-T insisted on a crucial if subtle distinction between himself as author of the song
and the fictional character narrating the song. "At no point do I go out and say,
'Let's do it,'" he said. "I'm singing in the first person as a character who is
fed up with police brutality. I ain't never killed no cop. I felt like it a lot of times.
But I never did it." Without disavowing the song's significance, Ice-T was describing
an important gap between the subject of the utterance and the subject of enunciation in
the lyrics. While it is Ice-T who is singing the words to "Cop Killer," it is
not Ice-T who is "about to dust some cops off."(24)
This familiar narratological distinction,
however, swims against the current of the standard operations of the mass culture
industries. Media corporations do everything possible to link the person singing the song
with the possible meanings and structures of identification established in the song.
Constructing the "star" (usually, but not always the singer) as the creative and
responsible "author" of the musical text is the record company's most powerful
and effective marketing tool. Not only are company planners able to predict a certain
minimum sales figure based on the sales of the star's previous release, the star's
management can lease the star's image and sound to the marketers of other products,
linking these products to the already existing structures of fan identification, drawing
on the power of already established desire. Ice-T's insistence on the distinction between
the characters in his song and his own person stood little chance of overturning these
marketing strategies. Even more importantly, however, this commonly used artistic license
could not stand in the way of the dominant white culture's need to blame black culture for
the violence it saw in Los Angeles.(25)
COP KILLING IN MASS
CULTURE
The question that still must be asked is why it
was "Cop Killer," and not any other of a number of possible musical, cinematic
or televisual texts that became the object of this censorship campaign. In order to
approach this question it becomes necessary to move beyond the social context of the Los
Angeles rebellion and turn instead to the musical construction of subjectivity in
"Cop Killer."(26)
In the June 1992 newsletter sent to members of
the Dallas Police Association that initiated the Time Warner boycott, senior police
captain Glenn White wrote that "Cop Killer" "glamorizes the ambushing of
police officers."(27) If this were the sole transgression of the
song, then we might expect that other media products with similar characteristics would
have attracted similar responses. For instance, during the summer of 1991, the most
popular movie of the season was "Terminator 2." In this movie, Arnold
Schwarzenneger plays an android who must protect a young man from all of his enemies. In
the course of the movie, this android shoots, stabs, runs over and maims hundreds of
police officers. However, the movie caused no uproar. Hundreds of movies released each
year depict violence against police officers, other representatives of the government as
well as ordinary citizens. In fact, there is an entire genre of films that are referred to
as "Body Count" movies because of the large number of grisly murders that occur
in them. Although these films occasionally inspire an individual minister or newspaper
columnist to rail against Hollywood violence, no "Body Count" film has ever
become the target of a nationally organized police boycott.
But perhaps it is inappropriate to compare music
and films. Perhaps there is something about music that makes it different from the movies.
Maybe music--its beat, its aural texture and its intimately vocalized lyrics--affects us
more personally, more powerfully than do the movies. If "Cop Killer"'s status as
music determines its reception, then we might expect earlier popular songs that describe
the deaths of police officers to have drawn the wrath of their organizations. For
instance, the first verse of Woody Guthrie's 1946 recording of "Pretty Boy
Floyd" describes a case of rude behavior by a police officer in response to which
Pretty Boy Floyd murders the sheriff with his log chain. No vice president has called this
classic American folk song obscene, no members of congress and no president have ever
attacked Folkways Records for releasing this recording. In fact, Folkways is now part of
the federal government and operates as a branch of the Smithsonian Institution. It could
not have been just the lyrical description of the murder of a law enforcement officer that
sparked the intense response to "Cop Killer."
One might object that Woody Guthrie's albums have
never benefited from the mass distribution networks available to Time-Warner. A better
example, then, might be Eric Clapton's recording of the Bob Marley song, "I Shot the
Sheriff," which reached the number one position in Billboard's charts on September
14, 1974. The main character in this song states, "Sheriff John Brown always hated
me, for what I don't know, Everytime I would plant a seed, he would kill it before it
grow, So I, I shot the sheriff."(28) This recording meets both the
lyrical criterion of a song that describes killing a law enforcement officer and the
distribution criterion of being a successful mass cultural product. But, again, no public
uproar accompanied the circulation of this recording. Evidently, even these two qualities
are not sufficient for producing governmental outrage and provoking corporate censorship.
A historian might protest that social conditions
were radically different in the 1970s. A more recent musical advocacy of violence against
police then can be found on Lou Reed's critically acclaimed album, New York, released in
1989. This album focuses on explicit descriptions of the racial turmoil and social tension
that were wracking the city, including direct references to the Howard Beach incident. One
song, "Romeo had Juliette," includes the line, "This cop who died in
Harlem, You'd think they'd get the warning, I was dancing when his brains ran down the
street."(29) No police union tried to force Warner Brothers to
recall that celebration of the death of a police officer. Evidently, even more than the
combination of lyrical transgression, mass distribution and tense social conditions must
be necessary to produce such an action.
My point is that in order to understand why
"Cop Killer" drew such organized outraged resistance, we have to understand how
popular music works at the level of the construction of subjectivity. In an attempt to
isolate some of the critical musical elements, I want to focus on two versions of the
song, "I Shot the Sheriff"--Eric Clapton's version, which went to number one,
and the original recording by Bob Marley and the Wailers.
To me there are several key elements that
sonically distinguish these two versions. The most significant, obviously, is the greater
rhythmic sophistication and subtlety of the Wailer's version. While Clapton's band echoes
the stylistic rhythmic qualities by which Anglo-Americans recognize Jamaican reggae, their
performance is rather stiff and repetitive when compared to the Wailer's fluid and supple
approach to the same material. In contrast to Clapton's somewhat plodding rhythm section,
the bass line and the drums never echo each other in Marley's arrangement. Instead, they
set up an intriguing subtle tension that moves the listener's body across complexly
patterned beats. I want to emphasize here that I am not valorizing the Wailers'
"natural rhythm." There is nothing natural about this; their musical
sophistication is wholly cultural.
The second major difference between the two
recordings lies in those aspects of musical sound referred to as timbre. While the actual
pitches and harmonic structures of the two arrangements are virtually identical, the
recordings sound quite different. The tonalities of Clapton's arrangement derive from a
higher yet more narrow frequency range than they do in Marley's. Clapton's version is
dominated by the clipped strumming of a Fender Stratocaster guitar--that um-chicka
sound--and the timbral feel of Clapton's version is much more tense and anxious. Marley's
version features a wider variety of timbres and arranges these timbres in a widely
dispersed fashion that produces a feeling of greater space in the sound. The listener is
invited into this open musical space rather than being determinedly directed by the music.(30)
I have gone into such detail about the
differences between these two recordings because I believe that conjointly they neatly
represent the set of theoretical points I want to make about the musical construction of
subjectivity. My basic theoretical assertion is that variations in timbral qualities and
rhythmic articulations are the primary aural properties whereby music functions as a
signifying practice constitutive of social identity. The social process of responding to
music can be characterized as the dialectical interactions of a particular group of people
with an aesthetic system of aural textures that effectively construct this group as
subjects of a specific community. The sound textures that are culturally productive are
distinguished not by their relative relations of pitch, nor by their harmonic structure,
nor their lyrical content. Rather, the significance of these textures derives from their
specific timbral mapping of the boundary between noise and music and the precise rhythmic
organization of these timbres.
The shapes of musical rhythm are, of course,
tightly linked to the rhythms of the physical body. While variations in musical timbre
stimulate and motivate the body, variations in rhythm impose a layer of social
organization upon those movements. Susan McClary has proposed that "music...is a site
where we learn how to experience socially mediated patterns of kinetic energy, being in
time, emotions, desire, pleasure and much more." These patterns, she suggests, are
"already marked with histories"--the different histories of different groups.(31) To a very great extent, then, we belong to those social groups who
"dance"--that is, who respond physically--to the same music in much the same way
that we do. In an oft-quoted passage, Raymond Williams has argued that,
Rhythm is a way of transmitting a description of
an experience, in such a way that the experience is re-created in the person receiving it,
not merely as an 'abstraction' or an emotion but as a physical effect on the organism--on
the blood, on the breathing, on the physical patterns of the brain...The dance of the
body, the movement of the voice, the sounds of instruments are, like colours, forms,
patterns, means of transmitting...experience in so powerful a way that the experience can
be literally lived by others.(32)
These, then, are the two most significant
elements of music-- there must be musical sound, culturally (not naturally, not
universally) distinguished in its timbres from noise, and this sound must be rhythmically
organized.
As a signifying practice--that is, as a cultural
form that both expresses and constructs identities--music operates through gestures and
form rather than linear meaning, always through "the recognition (implicit or not) of
a familiar structure within an aesthetic construction."(33) This
recognition is the response of musical pleasure, the bodily acknowledgment that that sound
is a sound I know, that beat is a beat I understand, that I move to, that moves me. When
discussing the musical production of subjectivity, we have to emphasize both the physical
and the cultural nature of the articulations of timbre and rhythm--the dialectical
interactions between bodies and sounds.
In other words, Eric Clapton's "I Shot the
Sheriff" and Lou Reed's "Romeo had Juliette" were not perceived to be
threats because their specific rhythmic and timbral qualities constructed audiences that
were not open to their lyrical significance; while the songs described anti-police
violence, these performances failed to articulate an oppositional subject through their
signifying processes.
One song by the Los Angeles rap group, N.W.A.,
stands as a direct precedent to the "Cop Killer" controversy. In 1988, N.W.A.
released their first album, Straight Outta Compton. Among its depictions of street
life, violence, masculine boasting and misogyny, was a song entitled, "Fuck tha
Police," which includes the line "takin' out a police will make my day."
The group's record company received a letter from the FBI's public affairs office noting
that the song "encourages violence and disrespect for the law enforcement
officer." During the band's tours that summer and fall, they were followed by a fax
campaign urging local police departments to find an excuse to cancel each show. The FBI
were not able to organize and mobilize an effective coalition of local and national
government officials, however, and Straight Outta Compton went on to sell over two
million copies to the rapidly growing audience for hardcore or "gangsta" rap.
Although this new genre was beginning to make inroads into the suburban market by this
point, performers like N.W.A. were still believed to be aiming their music at an
inner-city audience that was already considered to be dangerous, already marked off from
mainstream culture, already under constant police surveillance. As a result, no censorship
campaign seemed necessary to purge the marketplace from the threat represented by the
song, "Fuck tha Police"; its threat was apparently being managed by other, more
coercive means. "Cop Killer," while deploying the lyrical strategies of gangsta
rap, was perceived to be more threatening because it clearly did speak to a different
audience. Musically, it is undeniably heavy metal, a genre that directly addresses
suburban white male adolescents.(34)
IDENTIFICATION IN HEAVY
METAL
Of all the genres of popular music disseminated
throughout the late-1980s and 1990s, heavy metal has received the most attention from
communication scholars and social psychologists. Researchers have investigated the
schematic information processing of heavy metal lyrics, the effects of aggressive rock
songs on tests designed to measure hostility, and the relationship between family
background and a preference for what the researchers called "music with lyrics that
promote homicide, suicide, or satanic practices." The vast majority of the studies
report negative findings. That is, these social scientists discovered no statistically
significant relationship between listening to heavy metal music and an increase in
destructive behavior. Despite these persistent negative results, however, psychological
investigations of the social impact of heavy metal continue to be funded and to produce
publishable papers. Clearly, there is the perception of a profound social threat here.(35)
While these studies have been unable to uncover
any direct social effects deriving from listening to heavy metal, they have been able to
specify some social and cultural characteristics of the fans of this music. Heavy metal
fans are "more likely than expected to be male and white," and they reside in
suburban neighborhoods. In addition, heavy metal fans identify with the skill of the
musicians and are likely to envision a music career for themselves.(36)
In other words, heavy metal music produces a
powerful set of subjective effects within a specific subgroup of the American population.
Within heavy metal, the emphasis on musical virtuosity establishes the possibility for a
musical identification on the part of the fans, allowing for the dialectical production of
imaginary identities. Now, heavy metal has its own specific definition of virtuosity. The
guitar playing must utilize a limited range of tonalities and harmonics that can only be
generated by loud volumes, dancing along the barrier between music and noise. The
attention of the listener is then focused along this culturally determined barrier where
it falls on the sheer speed of the ascending and descending notes. These phrases tend to
be organized into rigid rhythmic structures which are reinforced by the drumming. The
overall effect produces an identification with individual skill and power that must be
displayed within tight disciplinary structures.(37)
The potential for subjective identification with
any lyrics is increased when these lyrics are surrounded by a musical structure that
reinforces commonly shared cultural values. For a specific social group--suburban, white,
male adolescents--heavy metal provides such a musical structure.
COP KILLER
On his 1991 release, Original Gangster, Ice-T
announced the formation of his "all black hardcore band, Body Count." Body Count
is not another rap act; their music is constructed within the conventions of hardcore
heavy metal.(38) Ice-T anticipated the possible objection that he had
"sold out" by working within the conventions of rock music by means of a set of
spoken comments.
You see, a lot of people don't realize that
rock'n'roll is truly black music. It was created by Chuck Berry, Little Richard and black
people like that who started it off back in the day, you know. So far as I'm concerned,
music is music. I don't look at it as rock, r&b, all that kind of stuff...I do what I
like and I happen to like rock'n'roll. And I feel sorry for anybody who listens to only
one form of music.(39)
This somewhat disingenuous speech leads into a
preview of the title cut from the Body Count album. It becomes immediately clear from the
first few notes and words of this song, however, that the music of Body Count is not just
an idle investigation of new musical forms. It is a deliberate attempt on the part of
Ice-T to construct a new audience. The song is directly addressed to an assumed suburban
listener. The idyllic life shown in popular television programs like the Cosby Show is
pointedly contrasted with the violence represented in gangsta rap. A particularly sharp
contrast is drawn between the images of the police prominent in the differing cultural
forms. In TV sitcoms, police rescue scared kittens; in gangsta rap, police shoot kids in
the backyard. But it is not solely the lyrical address that makes the song connect with
this new audience. Body Count represents Ice-T's most direct and self-conscious effort to
speak to a suburban white audience, combining the piledriver rhythms and blistering guitar
runs of heavy metal with the lyrical themes common to the gangsta aesthetic. This was the
ultimate musical transgression of "Cop Killer." Not only does the song
"glamorize the ambushing of police officers," it does so within a musical
context that encourages identification by white suburban males who admire the performance
of individual virtuosity within a highly disciplined order. In other words, "Cop
Killer" and no other anti-police mass cultural product became the object of this
censorship campaign because it was so successful at producing a musical structure of
identification that could appeal to and could be identified with by members of the
Combined Law Enforcement Association of Texas (the instigators of the censorship campaign)
or, perhaps more frighteningly, their children. The ability of this song to speak across
culturally constructed racial barriers inspired the cooperation of numerous other police
organizations, the National Rifle Association, sixty members of Congress, Oliver North,
Vice President Quayle, Charlton Heston and their allies.
CODA
On July 28, Ice-T announced that he had asked
Warner Bros to withdraw the track from the Body Count album, saying his request was being
made out of concern for the safety of Warner employees who had received bomb threats. The
record company said that it would immediately stop manufacturing and distributing the
original album and would replace it with a new version minus "Cop Killer." They
asked every record store in the country to return the old version of the album for
complete credit. The week of this announcement the Body Count album had its most
successful sales ever, racing up to number 29 as thousands of record collectors,
journalists and academics rushed out to buy their copies.(40)
At the New Music Seminar the previous June, Ice-T
had said, "What they're really trying to do is shut down my platform. They do not
want to let me be able to speak to the masses. That's what they want to do." Not only
were the police organizations able to shut down Ice-T's platform, but they were able to
use his platform to make their own statements. Rather than forming an expression of rage
over already existing conditions in the nation's inner-city neighborhoods, "Cop
Killer" was effectively constructed as a cause of violence and disruption, and black
culture became the scapegoat for the Los Angeles rebellion, blamed for the events in April
of 1992. The battle over the meaning of "Cop Killer" was fought out in the very
limited battleground of the national news media. In this terrain, simple statements and
simple interpretations that take advantage of unspoken assumptions are much more powerful
than complex arguments that attempt to expose those assumptions.(41)
The Los Angeles rebellion brought to the surface
long standing tensions over racially enforced conditions of social inequality that the
policies of the Reagan/Bush administrations had only exacerbated. The successful campaign
to censor "Cop Killer" and remove it from the cultural marketplace demonstrates
the continuing effects of these policies. For the battle over the meaning of "Cop
Killer" and the dominant interpretation of the Los Angeles rebellion as the work of
"the criminal element" both depend upon the same repressive mechanism. The
mainstream American media and the federal government still cannot confront the radical
social inequalities reproduced through our continuing racialism. Therefore, a powerful
reaction formation takes place in the white middle-class suburban unconscious that
retroactively creates a radical otherness, a wall of essential difference, between those
identifying with the Cosby show and those identifying with gangsta rap. "Cop
Killer" had to be censored because it demonstrates at the level of shared lived
experience that this difference is not essential, rather it is undeniably historical and
cultural. By producing a musical structure of identification that suburban white
middle-class listeners could find pleasurable and meaningful, "Cop Killer"
linked together the identities of urban black males with the desires and demands of
suburban whites.(42) Rendering explicit the most unspeakable fear of
the white unconscious, "Cop Killer" itself had to be repressed.
NOTES
Barry Shank teaches cultural history, cultural
theory, popular culture and popular music in the American Studies program at the
University of Kansas. He is currently working on a cultural history of the American
greeting card industry.
Versions of this article have been presented to
the Mid- America American Studies Association, the American Studies Association, and the
Hall Center for the Humanities at the University of Kansas. The audiences at each of these
presentations provided me with helpful critical comments that helped focus the arguments
of the paper. Written versions have benefited from critical readings by Philip Barnard,
John Gennari, David Katzman, Cheryl Lester, Dewar MacLeod, Norm Yetman, and anonymous
readers for the journal. In addition to thanking these colleagues, I would like to express
my appreciation to the students who have taken my 20th Century American Popular Music
class during the past two years.
1) I have constructed the brief
narrative that begins this article out of numerous newspaper stories, including: Anon.,
"Rapper Ice-T Defends Song Against Spreading Boycott," New York Times
June 19, 1992 p.C24; "Vice President Calls corporation Wrong for Selling Rap
Song," New York Times June 20, 1992 p.L9; Bruce D. Brown, "Quayle Boosts
'Cop Killer' Boycott Campaign," Washington Post June 20, 1992 pp. B1,5.; Avis
Thomas-Lester & Marylou Tousignant, "Reaction to Ice-T Song Heats Up: 60
Congressmen Join Complaint," Washington Post June 25, 1992 pp.C1,3; Robert
Hilburn and Chuck Phillips, "For 'Gangsta' Style Rappers, Urban Explosion is No
Surprise," Los Angeles Times May 2, 1992; Robert Hilburn, "Beyond the
Rage," Los Angeles Times May 24, 1992 Calendar Section pp.6,60; Chuck
Phillips, "Rap Song Protest Heats Up," Los Angeles Times June 13, 1992
pp.F1,5; Chuck Phillips, "Police Groups Urge Halt of Record's Sale," Los
Angeles Times June 16, 1992 p.F1; Chuck Phillips, "'Cop Killer' Controversy Spurs
Ice-T Album Sales," Los Angeles Times June 18, 1992 p.F1; David Treadwell,
"Ice-T Rips Efforts to Suppress His 'Cop Killer' Song," Los Angeles Times
June 19, 1992 F1,14; Alan citron, "Too Big to Boycott? Time Warner Profits From Flap
Over Rap," Los Angeles Times June 24, 1992 D1,3; James Rainey and Frederick M.
Muir, "City, County Deplore 'Cop Killer' Disc," Los Angeles Times June
24, 1992 B3,8; Thom Duffy and Charlene Orr, "Texas Police Protest Ice-T Song," Billboard
June 20, 1992 p.98; Chris Morris, Bill Holland, Charlene Orr, Paul Verna, Ed Christman,
"Quayle, Congressmen, L.A. Pols Join 'Cop Killer' Posse," Billboard July
4, 1992 pp.1,83; Chris Morris, Greg Reibman, Bill Holland, "Title Unknown," Billboard
July 11, 1992 pp.1,71; Chris Morris, Graig Rosen, Melinda Newman, "Count Rises on
Dealer 'Body Count' Ban," Billboard July 18, 1992 pp.3,74; Chris Morris,
"Police, Time Warner Face Off Over 'Cop Killer,'" Billboard July 25, 1992
pp.1,71; Chris Morris, "Some Time Warner Protesters Relent," Billboard August
1, 1992 pp.8,115; Chris Morris, "'Cop' Removal Satisfies the Foes, To a Point,"
Billboard August 8, 1992 pp.1,83; Irv Lichtman, "The Billboard Bulletin: Sire/Warner
Drops Ice-T," Billboard February 6, 1993 p.82.
(2) "Excerpts From Bush's
Speech on Los Angeles Riots: 'Need to Restore Order'" New York Times (May 2,
1992) p.A9
(3) "Buchanan Calls For
Winning Back 'Soul of America'" Los Angeles Times 5/28/92 p.A5 (excerpt from
commencement speech given May 9 and provided to the newspaper by his campaign committee).
(4) Robert Hilburn and Chuck
Phillips, "For 'Gangsta' Style Rappers, Urban Explosion is No Surprise" Los
Angeles Times (May 2, 1992) p?;
(5) Jello Biafra, "Police
On My Back," Spin (September 1992) 72-75.
(6) The "feud" over
the authorship of "gangsta" is an argument about originality and invention. Both
Ice-T and N.W.A., laid public claim to this authorship. It differs from "marketplace
competition" insofar as the latter refers to the battle for sales. Of course, the
claim to authorship and originality has effects in the marketplace, even though the
marketplace is not the final arbiter of "originality."
(7) Havelock Nelson and Michael
A. Gonzales, Bring The Noise: A Guide to Rap Music and Hip-Hop Culture New York:
Harmony Books (1991) p.111. Nelson and Gonzales describe these tracks as "intense
grooves" that describe life "close to the edge in the criminal
underground."
(8) Bruce D. Brown, "Quayle
Boosts 'Cop Killer' Boycott Campaign" Wash Post 6/20/92 pp.B1,5.
(9) See Roger Abrahams, Deep
Down in the Jungle: Negro Narrative Folklore from the Streets of Philadelphia New
York: Aldine Publishing (1970); Greil Marcus, "Sly Stone: The Myth of
Staggerlee," in Mystery Train: Images of America in Rock'n'roll Music New
York: Dutton (1975)75-111; "street..." and "hard-fought..." from Jon
Pareles, "On Rap, Symbolism and Fear," New York Times Feb 2, 1992 Section
2, p.1.
(10) Robert Hilburn,
"Beyond the Rage," Los Angeles Times (May 24, 1992) Calendar Section
pp.6,60.
(11) One couplet from N.W.A.'s
"Fuck tha Police" will exemplify the extreme claims common to gangsta rap.
"Ice-Cube will swarm on any motherfucker in a blue uniform, Just cuz I'm from the
CPT, punk police are afraid of me." Jon Pareles discusses mainstream media use of
gangsta rap to stand in for African-American music in op.cit. There is an ongoing dialogue
within the rap community about gangsta rap and its responsibility to the community. Tricia
Rose discusses this dialogue in Black Noise: Rap Music and Black Culture in
Contemporary America (Hanover: 1994).
(12) Jerry Adler, Jennifer
Foote and Ray Sawhill, "The Rap Attitude," Newsweek (March 19, 1990)
56-59. Emphasis in the original. The article also discusses Guns 'n Roses as an example of
"attitude" in heavy metal. Hence the mention of "guitar strings."
(13) See Robert Hilburn and
Chuck Phillips, "For 'Gangsta' Style Rappers, Urban Explosion is No Surprise" Los
Angeles Times (May 22, 1992).
(14) David Mills, "Sister
Souljah's Call to Arms" Washington Post 5/13/92 B1,4. Emphasis added.
"That mayor" is a reference to Los Angeles mayor, Tom Bradley, an
African-American.
(15) The Clinton campaign
cynically used this phrase to distance itself from Jesse Jackson's Rainbow Coalition, a
spectre that haunted that white voting bloc referred to as "Reagan Democrats"
throughout the campaign. See Jon Pareles, "Dissing the Rappers is Fodder for the
Sound Bite" New York Times (June 28, 1992) Section 2, p.20.
(16) This chart is considered
by the recording industry to be an accurate ranking of the relative sales figures of
commercially available recordings. An approximate two week time difference occurs between
the cover date of each weekly issue and the sales reported in that issue. So when the Body
Count album debuted in the charts at number 32 in the April 18 issue, that figure
represented the relative popularity--measured chiefly by sales figures--of that recording
as of April 4.
(17) See above for Dan Quayle's
comments on Body Count and Clinton's attack on Sister Souljah. Chuck Phillips, "Rap
Song Protest Heats Up," Los Angeles Times (June 13, 1992) pp.F1,5.
(18) Ice-T and Ernie C,
"Cop Killer," Rhyme Sindicate Music and Ernkneesa Music (ASCAP) 1992,
(19) Bruce D. Brown,
"Quayle Boosts 'Cop Killer' Boycott Campaign" Washington Post (June 20,
1992) pp.B1,5; Avis Thomas-Lester & Marylou Tousignant, "Reaction to Ice-T Song
Heats Up: 60 Congressmen Join Complaint," Washington Post (June 25, 1992)
pp.C1,3; Chuck Phillips, "Rap Song Protest Heats Up," Los Angeles Times (June
13, 1992) pp.F1,5; Chuck Philips, "Police Groups Urge Halt of Record's Sale" Los
Angeles Times (June 16, 1992) p.F1; Chuck Philips, "Black Lawmen Decry Warner
Boycott," Los Angeles Times (June 17, 1992) p.F4.
(20) Volante and Taylor quoted
in Chuck Philips, "Police Groups Urge Halt of Record's Sale" Los Angeles
Times (June 16, 1992) p.F1. Adler, et.al., op.cit.
(21) Chuck Philips,
"Police Groups Urge Halt of Record's Sale" Los Angeles Times (June 16,
1992) p.F1.
(22) Chuck Philips, "'Cop
Killer' Controversy Spurs Ice-T Album Sales," Los Angeles Times (June 18,
1992) p.F1.
(23) Chris Morris, Bill
Holland, Charlene Orr, Paul Verna, Ed Christman, "Quayle, Congressmen, L.A. Pols Join
'Cop Killer' Posse," Billboard (July 4, 1992) pp.1, 83; Bruce D. Brown,
"Quayle Boosts 'Cop Killer' Boycott Campaign" Wash Post 6/20/92 pp.B1,5;
Chris Morris, Craig Rosen, Melinda Newman, "Count Rises on Dealer 'Body Count'
Ban," Billboard (July 18, 1992) pp.3,74.
(24) The distinction between the person of Ice-T
and the narrator of Body Count's songs is firmly established in the spoken introduction to
the album's title cut. As the narrator finishes his description of the idyllic lives
depicted on television programs, he shouts, "But I live in South Central, and shit
ain't like that." Ice-T does not live in South Central. He is a rich and successful
musician and actor; he lives in the Hollywood hills. Ice-T quoted in Anonymous,
"Rapper Ice-T Defends Song Against Spreading Boycott," New York Times
(June 19, 1992) p.C24; for a discussion of the difference between the subject of the
utterance and the subject of enunciation see Kaja Silverman, The Subject of Semiotics
New York: Oxford University Press (1983).
(25) By focusing on the reports
in major media institutions and the public statements made by mainstream white
politicians, I hope to have made my case that this desire to blame black culture for the
Los Angeles rebellion was indeed a felt need of the dominant white culture. For an
excellent discussion of the star/commodity system, see David Buxton, "Rock Music, the
Star System, and the Rise of Consumerism," in Simon Frith and Andrew Goodwin, eds. On
Record: Rock, Pop, & the Written Word New York: Pantheon (1990) 427-440; for
discussions of record company marketing strategies, see Marc Eliot, Rockonomics: The
Money Behind the Music New York: Franklin Watts (1989) and Fredric Dannen, Hit Men:
Power Brokers and Fast Money Inside the Music Business New York: Random House (1990).
(26) Remember that the news
reports of the rebellion itself had no effect on either the sales of the recording nor on
its public noteriety.
(27) Duffy and Orr, op.cit.
(28) Bob Marley, "I Shot
the Sheriff," (Cayman Music, ASCAP) 1973.
(29) Lou Reed, "Romeo had
Juliette," New York Sire Records, song published by Metal Machine Music, Inc. (1989).
(30) I am not suggesting that
the Wailer's rhythmic sophistication and timbral openness is inherently superior to
Clapton's more direct approach. The two recordings construct and produce pleasure for
different audiences.
(31) Susan McClary, "Same
as it Ever Was: Youth Culture and Music," in Andrew Ross and Tricia Rose, eds., Microphone
Fiends: Youth Music and Youth Culture (New York: 1994) p.33.
(32) The Long Revolution (1961)
New York: Columbia U Press pp. 24- 25.
(33) R.Frances, cited in
Jean-Jacques Nattiez, Music and Discourse: Toward a Semiology of Music trans.
Carolyn Abbate Princeton: Princeton University Press (1990) p.121.
(34) Bruce D. Brown,
"Quayle Boosts 'Cop Killer' Boycott Campaign" Wash Post 6/20/92 pp.B1,5.
(35) See, for example, Wass,
Hannelore, et.al., "Adolescents' Interest in and views of Destructive Themes in Rock
Music," Omega: Journal of Death and Dying 19:3 (1988-89) 177-186; Wass,
Hannelore, et.al., "Factors Affecting Adolescents' Behavior and Attitudes toward
Destructive Rock Lyrics," Death Studies 13:3 (May-June 1989) 287-303; Iversen,
Janet et.al., "The Effect of Music on the Personal Relevance of Lyrics," Psychology:
A Journal of Human Behavior 26:2-3 (1989) 15-22; Wanamaker, Catherine and Marvin
Reznikoff, "Effects of Aggressive and Nonaggressive Rock Songs on Projective and
Structured Tests," Journal of Psychology 123:6 (Nov. 1989) 561-570; Hansen,
Christine and Ronald Hansen, "Schematic Information Processing of Heavy Metal
Lyrics," Communication Research 18:3 (June 1991) 373-411; Arnett, Jeffrey,
"Adolescents and Heavy Metal Music: From the Mouths of Metalheads," Youth and
Society 23:1 (Sept. 1991) 76-98; Wass, Hannelore, et.al., "Adolescents and
Destructive Themes in Rock Music: A Follow-Up," Omega: Journal of Death and Dying
23:3 (1991) 199-206. For a contrasting set of academic attacks on heavy metal see, Robert
Walser, "Professing Censorship: Academic Attacks on Heavy Metal," Journal of
Popular Music Studies 5 (1993) 68-78.
(36) See Hannelore Wass, et.al.
(1989) and Arnett (1991). The best book on heavy metal is Rob Walser, Running With the
Devil: Power, Gender and Madness in Heavy Metal Music (Hanover, 1993). Walser analyzes
the musical and the social functions of metal using both ethnographic and musicological
methodologies. His conclusions are both subtle and sensitive to the experience of metal
fans and musicians.
(37) See Walser (1993), and
"Eruptions: Heavy Metal Appropriations of Cllical Virtuosity," Popular Music 11/3
(1992) 263-308.
(38) "Hardcore" is a
term that developed out of the punk context. Hardcore punk is punk that insists on the
most extreme musical and ideological positions. The musical conventions of heavy metal
blend easily with the speed and confrontational attitude of hardcore punk in hardcore
heavy metal.
(39) Spoken intro to "Body
Count," O.G. Original Gangster Sire/ Warner Bros. Records (1991).
(40) Morris, ibid.
(41) David Treadwell,
"Ice-T Rips Efforts to Suppress His 'Cop Killer' Song," Los Angeles Times (June
19, 1992) pp.F1,14.
(42) For a similar argument
about a different time period, place and musical genre, see Eric Lott, Love and Theft:
Blackface Minstrelsy and the American Working Class (New York: Oxford University
Press, 1992). |