Conflicting Identities– the “old verities”?
Saturday, November 11th, 2006After completing the second half of Faulkner’s Light in August, it becomes clear that one of the “old verities” and “truths of heart” which he seeks is inevitably identity. Several characters in this novel grapple with the notion of who they are, where they come from, and most significantly, where they are going. Joe Christmas is one of the more obvious cases, as even from the very beginning he is constantly searching for clues to his past, clues to where he belongs. The toothpaste incident that we discussed in class is an early representation of this confusion, since when the dietician gives Joe the dollar “he did not believe that she would give it to him, because he would not give it to her if it were his. He didn’t know what she wanted him to do” (125). This instance gravely affects him, since Joe thought he was fairly certain of what would happen to him, yet this woman treats him in a way that he had never before been treated, causing him to question who he is and why his expected outcome (i.e. punishment) did not come to pass.
Joe has a similar conflict of identity when Ms. Burden brings up the concept of having a child with him. He thinks, “Why not? It would mean ease, security, for the rest of your life. You would never have to move again. And you might as well be married to her as this”, but then also thinking “No. If I give in now, I will deny all the thirty years that I have lived to make me what I chose to be” (265). This is the central issue that Joe has with his own being—that which he would ideally like to have, and that what he feels he deserves, which he masks as what he “chose”.
Finally, Joe’s vacillating identity is summed up when the people of Mottstown describe his capture, in that “He never acted like either a nigger or a white man. That was it. That was what made folks so mad. For him to be a murderer and all dressed up and walking the town like he dared them to touch him, when he ought to have been skulking and hiding in the woods… It was like he never even know he was a murderer, let alone a nigger too” (350). In this way, what seems to make the white townspeople so mad is that Joe never acts the way he should, i.e. like a black person. However, for Joe, the central issue is that he believes he should be able to act however he pleases, yet that he only deserves to act a certain way. He is thus unable to both live up to the expectations of those that surround him as well as those of himself, creating a paradox where he simply cannot belong.
Lena, on the other hand, seems refreshingly comfortable in the fact that she does not know where she is going or where she might end up. As discussed in class, she simply seems to think that it will all work itself out, even from the very beginning in that “she sits quite still, hearing and feeling the implacable and immemorial earth, but without fear or alarm” (29). This kind of uncertain tranquility seems to perplex others, in particular Byron and Hightower, who argue over her fate. Byron offers to find another place for her (other than Ms. Burden’s cabin), but Hightower insists “Why must she move? When she is comfortable there, with a woman at hand if she should need one” (299). This argument is representative of the tension of who Lena should be (someone with a better place to go) versus who she is (someone who is “comfortable” in her current state).
Perhaps Faulkner’s most telling assertion on this question of identity is seen quite abruptly—through who lives and who dies. Joe Christmas is killed, aptly, by a man whose gripe against Joe is that once dead, “Now you’ll let white women alone, even in hell” (464). In this way, Joe’s life is ended by someone who simply cannot grasp that Joe does not know his place, does not realize who he is supposed to be. Lena, on the other hand, is comfortable with her lack of identity, as observed by the driver of her truck, who comments, “I don’t think she had any idea of finding whoever it was she was following. I don’t think she ever aimed to…I think she had just made up her mind to travel a little further and see as much as she could since I reckon she knew that when she settled down this time, it would likely be for the rest of her life” (506). Lena is thus somewhat the antithesis of Joe, in that while he desperately does want to “settle” and know who he is, she is comfortable not knowing, and understands that eventually that knowledge will come. Until then however, she is simply content to let “a body get around” (507).