Considering the Secularist Variable
Friday, October 13th, 2006Admittedly, I found Peggy Pascoe’s book, Relations of Rescue, a bit dull, with overall uninteresting case studies. That is, until the final two chapters of her work. Perhaps I was just excited over the dwindling pages, but Pascoe’s discussion of the fall of Victorian Protestant morality in the “Anticlimax” intrigued me. Pascoe states, “For rescue home operations, the most significant of these changes was the shift from a Victorian gender system that idolized female purity, to a modern one that acknowledged female passion…Each harbinger of the new gender system pushed pious Protestant women further from the mainstream of American society. At the same time, the increasing frequency of modern gender arrangements outside rescue homes reinforced residents’ resistance to matrons’ moralism” (Pascoe Pg. 194). So is Pascoe trying to say that society, in general, became less moral? Regarding the book as a whole, I believe that Pascoe falls short in a larger conception of what morality is and who defines it by skipping over the evolving role that secular culture played in the diminishing role of Victorian Protestant morality. Society did not become less moral; there simply was a change in its definition and who yielded the control.
The Victorian female missionaries Pascoe describes for her readers based their authority on the social stereotype that women possessed a higher, if not definitive, sense of morality. In the early twentieth century, however, religion became increasingly secondary to the secularist controls over morals. Following the Industrial Revolution, an influx of immigrants from less religious cultures created a more diversified population that led to a trend of moral evaluation from a secularist viewpoint. The strongholds that religion and the Church once had over society, enforced by missionaries, often the type described by Pascoe, gave way to the opinions and the trends of the time. Being pious was no longer popular. Pascoe ignored an important variable by leaving out the secularist movement from her argument of Victorian Protestant missionary downfall.
Popular American culture, as it waned away from the Church, naturally waxed towards secularism, thus providing a new scope through which morality would be determined. The Victorian missionaries would have been served well had they taken a page from Pope Benedict XVI’s book. In recent years, Catholic missionaries in sub-Saharan Africa were propagating the immorality of condoms and birth control use. However, in sub-Saharan Africa, the HIV/AIDs rate is astronomical. Society became troubled by the Church purporting itself to be a moral beacon, yet engaging a “moral” practice that ultimately leads to death at a genocidal rate. As a response to this outcry, Pope Benedict XVI has allowed the use of condoms when designated to the prevention of HIV/AIDs. Because Pascoe’s Victorian missionaries had a “misunderstanding—if not cavalier rejection—of alternative systems of morality” (Pascoe Pg. 212), like secularism, they, themselves, contributed to their decreasing role as moral arbiters.