AS205: Inbetween Peoples

American Civilization III

About

In this course, we will explore the struggles and triumph "inbetween peoples" after Reconstruction and before WWII.

Archive for the 'Bederman II' Category

Refutations and Continuing Ramifications

Saturday, October 6th, 2007

The story of Charlotte Perkins Gilman finally sheds some light on the non-male side of Bederman’s efforts to study race and sex. Gilman set out to prove that “human advancement was a matter not of gender difference but of racial difference…Gilman argued that sex should not affect one’s contribution to civilization – that race was [...]

Read the rest of this entry »

The Wrong way to the Right outcome?

Saturday, October 6th, 2007

Charlotte Perkins Gilman is a different character than what we have seen.  She wrote in order to further the cause for white women yet by doing so she tactically put the other minorities in a place that elevated her.  Comparisons can be drawn to the situations that Roediger and Ngai brought up regarding the fight [...]

Read the rest of this entry »

I found it interesting that Perkins argument, based on the notion of racial supremacy, was actually quite irrelevant to white middle class men’s views of manliness and civilization. Perkins tried to gain equality for women by creating a racial bond between white men and white women. In her argument, she essentially displaced male [...]

Read the rest of this entry »

The Science of Manliness

Thursday, October 4th, 2007

The turn of the century saw both assertions of manliness and developments in evolution.  Bederman’s work makes clear that these two phenomena went hand in hand.  Darwinisim and earlier theories of evolution were employed to reinforce racial and gender stereotypes, lending validity to the idea that people, races and cultures developed over time.  Science provided [...]

Read the rest of this entry »