Submitted May 16, 2006, 7:46 PM
How many lectures have your missed so far (of 12):
What percentage of the assigned textbook chapters have you read:
How *personally* valuable do you find what you read in the textbook? (not: because it helps me study for the exams)
b. somewhat useful/ok for a requirement
|
What percentage of Equiano's "Interesting Narrative" did you read?
How valuable do you consider what you learned from the first paper assignment? (My goals were to have you working with a primary source, recognizing arguments and assessing evidence, and also to practice presenting your analysis.)
How many section meetings have your missed (or slept through/been totally unprepared for)?
When you prepare for section, how much of the assigned portion of reader do you usually read *before* section?
How valuable do you find what you are learning in section--for your understanding of what history is and what historians do?
Who is your TA?
How valuable is section for your understanding of the course content?
a. it is good augmentation and reinforcement
|
How did you find the midterm IDs?
The midterm study guide was (choose one):
The midterm essay question was:
The source interpretation was:
How often have you found the course website useful?
Would you prefer to have more context/theory lectures that provide a framework for the detailed narrative in the textbook, or content-rich lectures like Prof. Roberts' on Japan?
b. more of a mix in each lecture
|
If you could change just one thing about lecture, what would it be (if other, note in text comment box below):
Which statement best reflects your main feeling about the 2nd paper?
b. I have no ideas for a topic
|
Please comment on the course: What gripes do you have? What do you like about it? If you don't attend lecture often, why not? What can I do to improve lecture or the the course? Do you have any topics you REALLY want to see covered?
|
|
© 1996–2009, Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media. (Copyright Notice)
|