A Survey of the AHA, Designed by PhDinHistory (contains about 160 questions)


Submitted April 23, 2008, 10:13 PM

What is your status with the AHA?
member for less than 5 years
To how many scholarly associations do you pay membership dues?
3
What is your blogging status?
you blog
Have you interviewed (either as interviewer or interviewee) at the AHA convention?
never interviewed there
What is your experience with job search committees?
never been interviewed
What is your age?
31-35
What is your gender?
male
What is your race or ethnicity?
White
What is the highest degree you have obtained?
masters
If applicable, how many years have you spent teaching history?
0-5
If applicable, what is your academic rank or status?
Doctoral student
What is your experience with history doctoral programs?
currently or formerly a doctoral student but have never taught or advised doctoral students
For whom or what do you work?
Research university
What is your field/subject/discipline?
History
What is your geographical area of historical specialization?
United States
The AHA leads the historical profession.
strongly agree
The AHA does more advocacy for the historical profession than any other organization.
agree
The AHA does a good job of defining ethical and professional standards.
agree
The AHA does a good job of disseminating information about best practices in the field of history.
agree
The AHA does enough to preserve primary sources for historical research.
neither agree nor disagree
The AHA does a good job of publicizing historical research.
disagree
The AHA does a good job of revising its Constitution and Bylaws.
neither agree nor disagree
The AHA Council is doing a good job.
neither agree nor disagree
The AHA's Professional Division is doing a good job.
neither agree nor disagree
The American Historical Review is the best journal in the field of history.
neither agree nor disagree
The Perspectives magazine provides excellent news about the historical profession.
strongly agree
The AHA does a good job of providing information about the various careers available to historians.
strongly agree
The AHA publishes some great pamphlets.
strongly agree
The AHA awards plenty of prizes, fellowships, and awards.
disagree
The AHA publishes an excellent guide to funding sources for historians.
disagree
The AHA has put together an incredibly useful web site.
agree
The AHA has become too big.
disagree
The AHA should serve as an umbrella organization/society for historians.
strongly agree
Joining the AHA will help your career.
agree
The AHA has the power to reform the Job Market.
strongly disagree
The AHA has little to no power.
neither agree nor disagree
The AHA does not have enough influence to help historians obtain higher salaries through collective bargaining.
agree
The AHA would never advocate collective bargaining because the tenured professors in the AHA oppose unions for their graduate students.
agree
Historians with tenure should pay the most for AHA membership and conference registration.
strongly agree
The AHA should prohibit job interviewing at its annual conventions, because this practice is making things worse, not better, for job seekers.
disagree
Departments that refuse to follow AHA guidelines about the interview and hiring process should be blacklisted from the Job Register and refused ad space in Perspectives.
disagree
After the close of its convention, the AHA should send out an e-mail to everyone who registered for the conference or who reserved a room in one of the conference hotels, and ask them to fill out a brief survey about their experience with the job market that year.
strongly agree
Graduate students in history should unite and become a voting bloc within the AHA.
strongly agree
The AHA cannot prevent departments from booking a hotel room at the AHA convention and holding interviews that are not reported to the Job Register.
strongly agree
The AHA could easily survey history departments and find out how many applications they received for each of their job searches, whether it was only 25 or more than 200, since these departments already have to report the numbers to their human resources departments and the EEOC.
strongly agree
As history faculty retire, the AHA should lobby their departments to search for replacements in American or European history, so that the openings for history faculty will match the specializations of the majority of recent history PhDs.
strongly agree
The AHA should ask history doctoral programs to provide full disclosure of their attrition rate, placement rate, years to degree, and information about where their students end up working after graduation on their departmental web site.
strongly agree
The AHA should make the pursuit of social justice part of its mission statement.
strongly disagree
The AHA is doing all that it can to increase the numbers of African American, Hispanic, and Native American students in history doctoral programs.
strongly agree
The AHA should spend its money on a new headquarters.
strongly disagree
The AHA should create a major endowment that will secure its financial future.
strongly agree
Now that we have entered the digital age, where e-mails have replaced letters and are easily deleted by government officials, the AHA should work more closely with archivists to meet the new challenges of preserving the historical record.
strongly agree
The AHA should find and survey history PhDs in the "backlog" so that we will have better a statistical picture of everyone who is competing for tenure track jobs in history.
strongly agree
The AHA should become more proactive in its collection of data about the historical profession.
strongly agree



Survey created and managed using the Survey Builder, one of the tools from the Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media