Submitted April 24, 2008, 7:57 PM
What is your status with the AHA?
member for less than 5 years
|
To how many scholarly associations do you pay membership dues?
What is your blogging status?
you only comment on blogs
|
Have you interviewed (either as interviewer or interviewee) at the AHA convention?
What is your experience with job search committees?
What is your age?
What is your gender?
What is your race or ethnicity?
What is the highest degree you have obtained?
If applicable, how many years have you spent teaching history?
If applicable, how many years did you spend on the job market trying to obtain full-time employment?
If applicable, what is your academic rank or status?
What is your experience with history doctoral programs?
never a doctoral student and have never taught or advised doctoral students
|
For whom or what do you work?
What is your field/subject/discipline?
What is your geographical area of historical specialization?
What is your annual income?
The AHA leads the historical profession.
neither agree nor disagree
|
The AHA does more advocacy for the historical profession than any other organization.
neither agree nor disagree
|
The AHA does a good job of defining ethical and professional standards.
The AHA needs to endorse digital scholarship.
The AHA should fight harder against elitism in the history profession.
The AHA will never seriously combat elitism in the history profession, because it serves the interests of its leading members.
Please use the below space to enter any comments you would like to make.
The AHA should do more to eliminate the elitists who are preventing online PHD programs. Online learning is here to stay. The AHA needs to get on board while it is still in its infancy.
|
|
|
© 1996–2009, Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media. (Copyright Notice)
|